1,687
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Paper

Investigation of real-life operating patterns of wood-burning appliances using stack temperature data

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 393-409 | Received 31 Jul 2019, Accepted 14 Jan 2020, Published online: 09 Mar 2020
 

ABSTRACT

A study was undertaken to identify patterns of consumer use of outdoor wood boilers or outdoor wood furnaces (technically referred to as outdoor wood-fired hydronic heaters (OWHHs)) and indoor wood stoves (IWSs) to inform the development of performance testing protocols that reflect real-life operating conditions. These devices are manually fed, and their usage protocols are a function of a number of variables, including user habits, household characteristics, and environmental factors. In this study, researchers logged the stack wall temperatures of 4 OWHH and 20 IWS units in the states of New York and Washington over two heating seasons. Stack wall temperature is an indicator of changes in combustion modes. Two algorithms were developed to identify usage modes and cold and warm start refueling events from the stack wall temperature time series. A linear correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of heat demand on usage patterns. The results and methods presented here will inform the cataloging of typical operational patterns of OWHHs and IWSs as a step in the development of performance testing procedures that represent actual in-home usage patterns.

Implications: Current US regulatory programs for residential wood heating use a certification program to assess emissions and efficiency performance. Testing under this program uses a test that burns 100% of a single, standardized wood fuel charge to assess performance at different steady-state load conditions. This study assessed in-field operational patterns to determine if the current certification approach accurately characterized typical homeowner use patterns. The data from this study can be used to inform revisions to testing methods to increase certification test comparability between lab and field performance.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Rod Tinnemore, Washington Department of Ecology, Dr. Thomas Butcher and Dr. Rebecca Trojanowski of Brookhaven National Lab for helpful comments and review of the analysis approach, and Dr. Phil Hopke and Mauro Masiol of Clarkson University for helping deploy the temperature data loggers and data collection. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of NYSERDA or the State of New York, and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement of it.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) under Agreement Nos. [34263B and 63035].

Notes on contributors

Mahdi Ahmadi

Mahdi Ahmadi is an Environmental and Energy Analyst at Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM) in Boston, MA.

Josh Minot

Josh Minot is in the Ph.D. program at the University of Vermont Complex Systems Center

George Allen

George Allen is the Chief Scientist at Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM) in Boston, MA.

Lisa Rector

Lisa Rector is a Policy and Program Director at Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM) in Boston, MA.