ABSTRACT
Personal epistemological beliefs are considered to play an important role for processes of learning and teaching. However, research on personal epistemology is confronted with theoretical issues as there is conflicting evidence regarding the structure, stability, and context-dependence of epistemological beliefs. We give evidence how theoretical and methodological issues can partly be resolved by distinguishing between relatively stable “epistemological beliefs” and situation-specific “epistemological judgments.” A qualitative content analysis of a series of semistructured interviews (study 1) with pre-service teachers, teachers, and teacher educators as well as a statistical analysis of pre-service teachers’ extensive answers in questionnaires (study 2), both on the topic of “mathematical discovery,” reveal not only beliefs of the participants but also different qualities of judgments. Therefore, in further research both aspects of beliefs should be considered in a more differentiated manner when categorizing belief structures.
Funding
LeScEd (Learning the Science of Education), funded by the BMBF (Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany), is a research project comprising researchers from the University of Koblenz and Landau, the University of Göttingen, the Free University of Berlin, the University of Freiburg, and the University of Education Freiburg. Central research questions of this project include the modeling of scientific thinking and working of university students in educational disciplines. This article addresses a sub-project of LeScEd that studies epistemological beliefs with a special focus on mathematics.