246
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Socioeconomics, planning, and management

A social assessment of forest resource based on stakeholders’ perception: an application in three Balkans rural areas

, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 308-314 | Received 03 Apr 2020, Accepted 10 Jun 2020, Published online: 22 Jun 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Abstract: An inclusive and transparent participatory process in the Balkan region can facilitate information’s exchange between decision-makers and local community, and increase social acceptance of forest management outcomes. The study – developed in the “FOR Balkans” project – has two main objectives: stakeholders’ engagement in forest management scenarios’ development and implementation of a Spatial Decision Support System to enhance sustainable and multifunctional forest management. To achieve them, a face-to-face questionnaire survey was conducted in three study areas in the Balkans: Shkrel district (Albania), Rugova valley (Kosovo), Knjaževac municipality (Serbia). The questionnaire – provided as a digital application – was administered to a sample of stakeholders in each study area. Stakeholders’ opinions towards ecosystem services and forest management practices were investigated. Results show that in Rugova provisioning services are the most important ecosystem services, that can be enhanced through a greater use of wood residues for energy purposes. In Shkrel, stakeholders consider supporting services as the most important category of ecosystem services that they can be maintained and improved through the implementation of sanitary fellings. In Knjaževac, stakeholders emphasize cultural services’ importance, which can be enhanced by promoting mixed forests and improving recreational facilities.

Acknowledgments

The study was developed in the framework of “FOR Balkans project”, funded by Autonomous Province of Trento within the Trentino-Balkans Cooperation Program 2018-2020 – local development area. The authors gratefully acknowledge the hard work and support of project local partners: Local Democracy Agency Central and Southern Serbia, Association Trentino con i Balcani ATB, Trentino con il Kosovo TCK, VIS Albania.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Provincia Autonoma di Trento.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.