A social assessment of forest resource based on stakeholders’ perception: an application in three Balkans rural areas

References

• Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F. 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Indic. 21:17–29. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavez MD, Berentsen PBM, Oude Lansink AGJM. 2012. Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the analytical hierarchical process (AHP) technique. Agric Syst. 111:53–62. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2012.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Meo I, Cantiani MG, Ferretti F, Paletto A. 2018. Qualitative assessment of forest ecosystem services: the stakeholders’ point of view in support of landscape planning. Forests. 9:465. doi:10.3390/f9080465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Meo I, Paletto A, Cantiani MG. 2015. The attractiveness of forests: preferences and perceptions in a mountain community in Italy. Annals of Forest Research. 58(1):145–156. doi:10.15287/afr.2015.308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency (EEA). 2020. CORINE land cover (CLC) 2012, version 20. Accessed on 20 Dec 2019 ( URL: http://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover/clc-2012/view)
   Google Scholar
• Glück P, Avdibegović M, Čabaravdić A, Nonić D, Petrović N, Posavec S, Stojanovska M, Imočanin S, Krajter S, Lozanovska N, et al., 2011. In: private forest owners in the western Balkans – ready for the formation of interest associations. European Forest Institute Research Report 25, Joensuu; p. 133–174
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Baggethun E, Reyes-García V, Olsson P, Montes C. 2012. Traditional ecological knowledge and community resilience to environmental extremes: A case study in Doñana, SW Spain. Global Environmental Change. 22:640–650. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grilli G, Jonkisz J, Ciolli M, Lesinski J. 2016. Mixed forests and ecosystem services: investigating stakeholders’ perceptions in a case study in the Polish Carpathians. Forest Policy and Economics. 66:11–17. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2016.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häyhä T, Franzese PP, Paletto A, Faath BD. 2015. Assessing, valuing, and mapping ecosystem services in Alpine forests. Ecosystem Services. 14:12–23. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Aguilera PA, Montes C, Martín-López B. 2014. Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being. Ecological Economics. 108:36–48. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas J, Kangas A. 2005. Multiple criteria decision support in forest management—the approach, methods applied, and experiences gained. For Ecol Manage. 207(1–2):133–143. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamarque P, Tappeiner U, Turner C, Steinbacher M, Bardgett RD, Szukics U, Schermer M, Lavorel S. 2011. Stakeholder perceptions of grassland ecosystem services in relation to knowledge on soil fertility and biodiversity. Regional Environmental Change. 11:791–804. doi:10.1007/s10113-011-0214-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langat DK, Maranga EK, Aboud AA, Cheboiwo JK. 2018. The value of selected ecosystem services; a case study of East Mau forest ecosystem. Kenya Journal of Forests. 5(1):1–10. doi:10.18488/journal.101.2018.51.1.10.
   Google Scholar
• MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington D.C.:Island Press, World Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nijnik M, Nijnik A, Brown I. 2016. Exploring the linkages between multifunctional forestry goals and the legacy of spruce plantations in Scotland. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 46(10):1247–1254. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2015-0399.
   Google Scholar
• Oteros-Rozas E, Martín-López B, González JA, Plieninger T, López CA, Montes C. 2014. Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services in a transhumance social-ecological network. Regional Environmental Change. 14:1269–1289. doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0571-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelyukh O, Paletto A, Zahvoyska L. 2019. Comparison between people’s perceptions and preferences towards forest stand characteristics in Italy and Ukraine. Annals of Silvicultural Research. 43(1):4–14.
   Google Scholar
• ReESPA. 2017. Recommendation on public participation in policy-making process for Western Balkans. Regional school for public administration, 8th governing board meeting at ministerial level. Accessed on 20 Dec 2019 ( URL: https://www.rcc.int/docs/402/western-balkans–recommendation-on-public-participation-in-policy-making-process).
   Google Scholar
• Wolfslehner B, Vacik H, Lexer MJ. 2005. Application of the analytic network process in multi-criteria analysis of sustainable forest management. For Ecol Manage. 207(1–2):157–170. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar