247
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Knowing a donor and identifying as one: Determinants of people's willingness for related and anonymous living donation in Australia

&
Pages 524-535 | Received 26 Nov 2008, Accepted 01 May 2009, Published online: 19 Oct 2009
 

Abstract

Although living related donation (LRD) (living donation to a genetically/emotionally related recipient) is well established in Australia, living anonymous donation (LAD) to a stranger is rare. Given the increasing use of LAD overseas, Australia may likely follow suit. Understanding the determinants of people's willingness for LAD is essential but infrequently studied in Australia. Consequently, we compared the determinants of people's LRD and LAD willingness, and assessed whether these determinants differed according to type of living donation. We surveyed 487 health students about their LRD and LAD willingness, attitudes, identity, prior experience with blood and organ donation, deceased donation preference, and demographics. We used structural equation modelling (SEM) to identify the determinants of willingness for LRD and LAD and paired sample t-tests to examine differences in LRD and LAD attitudes, identity, and willingness. Mean differences in willingness (LRD 5.93, LAD 3.92), attitudes (LRD 6.43, LAD 5.53), and identity (LRD 5.69, LAD 3.58) were statistically significant. Revised SEM models provided a good fit to the data (LRD: χ2 (41) = 67.67, p = 0.005, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.04; LAD: χ2 (40) = 79.64, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.05) and explained 45 and 54% of the variation in LRD and LAD willingness, respectively. Four common determinants of LRD and LAD willingness emerged: identity, attitude, past blood donation, and knowing a deceased donor. Religious affiliation and deceased donation preference predicted LAD willingness also. Identifying similarities and differences in these determinants can inform future efforts aimed at understanding people's LRD and LAD willingness and the evaluation of potential living donor motives. Notably, this study highlights the importance of people's identification as a living donor as a motive underlying their willingness to donate their organs while living.

Acknowledgements

This study was partially supported by a grant from Queensland University of Technology's Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Human Health and Wellbeing Domain Small Grant Scheme to the second author.

Notes

1. It should be noted also that, in the clinical setting, the extent to which a potential donor has donated blood in the past (i.e. number of times) would be considered a more appropriate measure (reflecting an ongoing commitment to performing altruistic behaviours) rather than a dichotomous assessment of any past donation experience.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.