Publication Cover
Local Environment
The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability
Volume 26, 2021 - Issue 5
395
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Action research to improve water quality in Canadas Rideau Canal: how do local groups reshape environmental governance?

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 575-594 | Received 17 Sep 2020, Accepted 16 Feb 2021, Published online: 25 Mar 2021
 

ABSTRACT

The historic Rideau Canal, spanning 200 km between the Canadian cities of Ottawa and Kingston, is a world heritage site and recreational waterway. The waterway presents a governance challenge, with multiple jurisdictions and agencies responsible for its management, making it difficult to establish a common vision to address environmental issues. Local stakeholders are concerned about toxic algal blooms in the downstream section of the Canal (the Lower Cataraqui region) because these blooms limit use of the system and pose a potential threat to human and environmental health. In the absence of a strategy to effectively manage water quality, a grassroots group called the Three Lakes Water Quality Group (TLG), has brought various stakeholders together to initiate transdisciplinary discussions and find solutions. This article presents findings from action research with the TLG. Specifically, it examines (1) the activities and concerns of the TLG in the governance arena, (2) the views of local stakeholders on social-ecological issues, (3) the potential of using collaborative systems thinking to capitalise on the TLG’s activities. Our analysis is informed by interviews and a workshop. We recommend that the TLG mobilise collaborative systems thinking when meeting with other stakeholders to discuss raising awareness, enforcing policy and producing knowledge about water quality issues in the region. These findings have implications for the entire Rideau Canal and other historic waterways by revealing the potential of local residents to initiate dialogue and drive future co-governance efforts.

Acknowledgements

We thank all workshop and interview participants.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

Data available within its supplementary materials found here: doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5123894.

Notes

1 In Ontario, Conservation Authorities “are community-based watershed management agencies, whose mandate is to undertake watershed-based programs to protect people and property from flooding, and other natural hazards, and to conserve natural resources for economic, social and environmental benefits.” (Conservation Ontario Citationn.d.)

3 Evans and Stevens were participants, and Kotecha was an observer.

4 Every participant in the workshop consented to having their names and occupations appear in publications. Nevertheless, we assign pseudonyms to participants while accurately reporting their occupation or group membership.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Strategic Partnership [Grant number STPGP 506352].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.