Abstract
Leadership often becomes a topic of analysis when discussing challenges faced by higher education in an increasingly accountability‐driven world. This article examines leadership practices in one New Zealand higher education context. Rather than examining the traits and practices of strong leaders, however, it explores the effectiveness of a community‐centred distributive approach to leadership. It asks what role distributive leadership might play in higher education today and how effective it might be in preserving collegial cultures. The article first theorizes distributive leadership and associated concepts such as accountability, activity systems and power. Then, using a critically reflexive process, it presents three vignettes in a case study of distributive leadership in practice to assess its effectiveness in maintaining collegiality. Finally, in the article, I tentatively answer the research question by discussing how distributive leadership might mitigate the effects of an accountability‐driven higher education world.
Notes
This article has constructed one view of distributive leadership, illustrated it through a case study and addressed, but not completely answered, the research question ‘what role might distributive leadership play in higher education today and how effective might it be in preserving collegial cultures?’ The very tentative response to the question is that it can play a considerable role, provided the meaning of accountability is reframed to mean being mutually responsible to all other actors in the higher education enterprise, rather than merely meeting auditable standards. People and their relationships matter.