Well-being at onset of hormone replacement therapy: comparison between two continuous combined regimens

Abstract

Objectives To compare the effect on well-being of two continuous combined hormone replacement therapies (HRTs) in women starting treatment (‘starters’) and women switching from mainly sequential HRT (‘switchers’).

Methods This was a randomized, double-blind, 1-month trial, in which 249 postmenopausal women were treated with either conjugated estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (CE/MPA 0.625 mg/5 mg) or 17β-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate (E₂/NETA 2 mg/1 mg) continuously. Twelve items for measuring climacteric symptoms and well-being were reported daily on a validated symptom scale.

Results Women taking CE/MPA reported lower scores for breast tenderness (p = 0.005), depression (p = 0.019), irritability (p = 0.004) and tension (p = 0.048), compared with women taking E₂/NETA. Compared with pretreatment, both groups developed side-effects during the first week: breast tenderness, swelling and depression (p < 0.05). Starters, but also switchers, improved in sweats (p < 0.001 and p = 0.030). Compared with pretreatment ratings, switchers reported higher scores for breast tenderness (p < 0.001), depression (p = 0.050) and negative effects on daily life (p < 0.001), whereas starters reported only physical side-effects (p < 0.05). A history of premenstrual syndrome (PMS) predicted high scores for swelling (p = 0.023), depression (p = 0.024), tension (p = 0.009), irritability (p = 0.027), headache (p < 0.001) and negative effects on daily life (p < 0.001).

Conclusions CE/MPA 0.625 mg/5 mg is better tolerated than E₂/NETA 2 mg/1 mg, and starters react differently from switchers. Side-effects occur more quickly than benefits with HRT, and are more frequent in women with previous PMS.

• POSTMENOPAUSAL
• CONTINUOUS COMBINED HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY
• WELL-BEING