Conflict Research and the ‘Decline’ of Civil War

Abstract

In recent years a number of scholars have suggested that there has been a decline in the absolute numbers of civil wars since the early 1990s, and this claim is purportedly supported by empirical evidence. This paper explores the methodological challenges which confront the study of conflict trends and identifies a number of problems with prevailing approaches. It argues that a differentiated approach to the concept of civil war is necessary before it is possible to make claims about trends in numbers of conflicts, because even the most sophisticated methodological processes have problems related to the manner in which they define and codify armed conflict. Nevertheless, the paper accepts that there has been a decline in the number of major civil wars, and it proposes – and evaluates – a number of explanations for the decline in such wars. These are: the decline of potent ideology since the end of the Cold War, which had hitherto ignited and/or exacerbated armed violence; the decline in intervention by third parties in civil war, a key feature of ‘proxy’ conflicts during the Cold War; the increasing tendency for secession – or hard partition – to be recognised by the international community, which has defused some ongoing conflicts; the increasingly interventionist nature of peacekeeping and peacebuilding activities by international organisations; the growing tendency for powerful states to view civil war and state failure as a potential security threat, resulting in a more substantial effort to resolve conflict which might have hitherto been regarded as ‘merely’ a humanitarian issue or even completely ignored; and the growing number of consolidated democracies.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the editors and the anonymous reviewers of the article for their help.

Notes

 1. Andrew Mack, Human Security Report (New York: Oxford UP 2005) p.vii.

 2. Keith Krause and Michael Williams, ‘Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods’, Mershon International Studies Review 40/2 (1996) pp.229–54; Richard Wyn Jones, Security, Strategy and Critical Theory (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner 1999); Ken Booth (ed.), Critical Security Studies and World Politics (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner 2005); Lene Hansen, Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War (London: Routledge 2006).

 3. Donald M. Snow, Uncivil Wars: International Security and the New Internal Conflicts (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner 1996) p.1.

 4. Mary Kaldor, New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era (Cambridge: Polity 2006) p.7.

 5. Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict, Final Report (Washington, DC: Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict 1997); Simon Chesterman (ed.), Civilians in War (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner 2001); Mats Berdal and David M. Malone (eds), Greed and Grievance: Economic Agendas in Civil Wars (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner 2000); Mark Duffield, Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security (London: Zed 2001); International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS), The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre 2001); Dietrich Jung (ed.), Shadow Globalization, Ethnic Conflicts and New Wars: A Political Economy of Intra-State War (London: Routledge 2003); Kaldor (note 4); David Keen, ‘The Economic Functions of Violence in Civil Wars’, Adelphi Paper 320 (Oxford: Oxford UP 1998); Michael L. Ross, ‘The Political Economy of the Resource Curse’, World Politics 51/2 (1999) pp.297–322; William Shawcross, Deliver Us From Evil: Peacekeepers, Warlords and a World of Endless Conflict (New York: Simon & Schuster 2000); Donald M. Snow (note 3).

 6. ICISS (note 5) p.4.

 7. Mary Kaldor, ‘Wanted: Global Politics’, The Nation 18 Oct. 2001, p.16.

 8. Amalendu Misra, Politics of Civil Wars. Conflict, Intervention and Resolution (Oxford: Routledge 2008).

 9. Ted Robert Gurr, Monty G. Marshall and Deepa Khosla, Peace and Conflict 2001: A Global Survey of Armed Conflicts, Self-Determination Movements, and Democracy (College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management 2000) p.9.

10. Monty G. Marshall and Benjamin R. Cole, ‘Global Report on Conflict, Governance, and State Fragility 2008’, Foreign Policy Bulletin (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2008) p.3.

11. Monty G. Marshall and Benjamin R. Cole, ‘Global Report on Conflict, Governance, and State Fragility 2008’, Foreign Policy Bulletin (Cambridge University Press 2008) p.7.

12. Mack (note 1) p.1

13. Mack (note 1) p.22.

14. Available in full online at < www.hsrgroup.org/>.

15. Lotta Harbom, Erik Melander and Peter Wallensteen, ‘Dyadic Dimensions of Armed Conflict, 1946–2007’, Journal of Peace Research 45/5 (2008) pp.697–710, at p.698.

16. Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research at the Department of Political Science, University of Heidelberg Conflict Barometer (Heidelberg: Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research at the Department of Political Science 2007) p.1.

17. Jack A. Goldstone, Robert Bates, Ted Robert Gurr, Michael Lustik, Monty G. Marshall, Jay Ulfelder and Mark Woodward, A Global Forecasting Model of Political Instability, Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, 1–4 Sept. 2005.

18. Dan Smith, ‘Trends and Causes of Armed Conflict’ in Martina Fischer and Norbert Ropers (eds) Berghof Handbook for Conflict Transformation (Berlin: Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management 2000); Edward Newman, ‘The “New Wars” Debate: A Historical Perspective is Needed’, Security Dialogue 35/2 (2004) pp.173–89.

19. James D. Fearon and David D. Laitin, ‘Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War’, The American Political Science Review 97/1 (2003) pp.75–90; Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler, ‘On Economic Causes of Civil War’, Oxford Economic Papers 50/4 (1998) pp.563–73; Paul Collier, ‘Implications of Ethnic Diversity’, World Bank Working Paper, 2001/12 (Washington, DC: World Bank 2001).

20. Ted Robert Gurr, Mark Woodward and Monty G. Marshall, Forecasting Instability: Are Ethnic Wars and Muslim Countries Different?, Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, 1–4 Sept. 2005, p.3.

21. Goldstone et al. (note 17).

22. Ibrahim Elbadawi and Nicholas Sambanis, ‘How Much War Will We See? Estimating the Incidence of Civil War in 161 Countries’, Policy Research Working Paper 2001/01 (Washington, DC: World Bank 2001).

23. Olivia Bennett (ed.), Greenwar: Environment and Conflict (London: Panos 1991).

24. James Fairhead, ‘The Conflict over Natural and Environmental Resources’ in E. Wayne Nafziger, Frances Stewart and Raimo Väyrynen (eds) War, Hunger, and Displacement: The Origins of Humanitarian Emergencies, volume 1 (Oxford: Oxford UP 2000).

25. Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler, ‘Greed and Grievance in Civil War’, World Bank Working Paper 2002/03 (Washington, DC: World Bank 2003).

26. Abiodun Alao and Funmi Olonisakin, ‘Economic Fragility and Political Fluidity: Explaining Natural Resources and Conflicts’ in A. Adebajo and C. Lekha Sririm (eds) Managing Armed Conflicts in the 21 ^st Century (London: Frank Cass 2001).

27. Ann Hironaka, Neverending Wars: The International Community, Weak States, and the Perpetuation of Civil War (Harvard: Harvard UP 2005).

28. Uppsala Conflict Data Program, online at < www.pcr.uu.se/research/UCDP/index.htm> accessed 1 Feb. 2009.

29. < www.hiik.de/en/konfliktbarometer/pdf/ConflictBarometer_2007.pdf> accessed 1 Feb. 2009.

30. PITF Problem Set Codebook: < http://globalpolicy.gmu.edu/pitf/pitfcode.htm#52> accessed 1 Feb. 2009.

31. Fearon and Laitin (note 19).

32. Melvin Small and David J. Singer, Resort to Arms: International and Civil War, 1816–1992 (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage 1982).

33. Meredith Reid Sarkees, ‘The Correlates of War Data on War: An Update to 1997’, Conflict Management and Peace Science 18/1 (2000) pp.123–44.

34. Nicholas Sambanis, ‘What is Civil War? Conceptual and Empirical Complexities of an Operational Definition’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 48/6 (2004) pp.814–58, at p.815.

35. J. Mueller, ‘The Banality of Ethnic War’, International Security 25/1 (2000) pp.42–70.

36. Oyvin Osterud, ‘Towards a More Peaceful World? A Critical View’, Conflict, Security and Development 8/2 (2008) pp.223–40; Vivienne Jabri, War and the Transformation of Global Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave 2007).

37. Nils Petter Gleditsch, Peter Wallensteen, Mikael Eriksson, Margareta Sollenberg and Håvard Strand, ‘Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset’, Journal of Peace Research 39/5 (2002) pp.615–37, at p.621.

38. Amy Chua, World on Fire (New York: Doubleday 2002).

39. Kalevi J. Holsti, ‘Political Causes of Humanitarian Emergencies’ in Nafziger et al. (note 24) p.239; Pierre Englebert, Stacy Tarango and Matthew Carter, ‘Dismemberment and Suffocation: A Contribution to the Debate on African Boundaries’, Comparative Political Studies 35/10 (2002) pp.1093–118; Nicholas Sambanis, ‘Partition as a Solution to Ethnic War: An Empirical Critique of the Theoretical Literature’, World Politics 52/4 (2000) pp.437–83.

40. Robert H. Jackson, Quasi-states: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 1990).

41. Robert H. Jackson, Quasi-states: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 1990) p.5.

42. Robert H. Jackson, Quasi-states: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 1990) p.10.

43. Robert H. Jackson, Quasi-states: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 1990) p.24.

44. For example, Jaroslav Tir, ‘Dividing Countries to Promote Peace: Prospects for Long-Term Success of Partitions’, Journal of Peace Research 42/5 (2005) pp.545–62.

45. For example, Alex J. Bellamy, Paul Williams and Stuart Griffin, Understanding Peacekeeping (Cambridge: Polity 2004).

46. Virginia Page Fortna, ‘Does Peacekeeping Keep Peace? International Intervention and the Durability of Peace Agreements after Civil War’, International Studies Quarterly 48/2 (2004) pp.269–92; Michael W. Doyle and Nicholas Sambanis, Making War and Building Peace (Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP 2006).

47. Robert I. Rotberg, ‘Failed States in a World of Terror’, Foreign Affairs 81/4 (2002) pp.127–40; Susan E. Rice, ‘The New National Security Strategy: Focus on Failed States’, Brookings Policy Brief no. 116 (February 2003); John J. Hamre and Gordon R. Sullivan, ‘Toward Postconflict Reconstruction’, The Washington Quarterly 25/4 (Autumn 2002) pp.85–96; Mark Turner and Martin Wolf, ‘The Dilemma of Fragile States’, Financial Times 18 Feb. 2005; Chester A. Crocker, ‘Engaging Failing States’, Foreign Affairs 82/5 (September/October 2003) pp.32–44; ‘Grappling With State Failure’, Washington Post 9 Jun. 2004, A20.

48. Raimo Vayrynen, ‘Complex Humanitarian Emergencies: Concepts and Issues’ in Nafziger et al. (note 24) p.43.

49. Holsti (note 39) p.239. See also Snow (note 3); Herfried Munkler, The New Wars (Cambridge: Polity Press 2004); Kaldor (note 4).

50. Hironaka (note 27).

51. Chuck Hagel, ‘A Republican Foreign Policy’, Foreign Affairs 83/4 (2004) p.64.

52. Gil Loescher, James Milner, Edward Newman and Gary Troeller (eds), Protracted Refugee Situations: Political, Human Rights and Security Implications (Tokyo: UNU Press 2008).

53. David M. Malone and Heiko Nitzschke, ‘Economic Agendas in Civil Wars: What We Know, What We Need to Know’, Discussion Paper no. 2005/7 (Helsinki: UNU-WIDER 2005) p.4. See also Carles Boix, ‘Economic Roots of Civil Wars and Revolutions in the Contemporary World’, World Politics 60/3 (April 2008) pp.390–437; Collier and Hoeffler (note 25); Paul Collier, ‘Doing Well Out of War’, World Bank Working Paper 1999/04 (Washington, DC: World Bank 1999); Karen Ballentine and Heiko Nitzsche (eds), Profiting from Peace: Managing the Resource Dimensions of Civil War (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner 2005); Richard Snyder, ‘Does Lootable Wealth Breed Disorder? A Political Economy of Extraction Framework’, Comparative Political Studies 39/8 (2006) pp.943–68; Richard Snyder and Ravi Bhavnani, ‘Diamonds, Blood and Taxes: A Revenue-Centered Framework for Explaining Political Order’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution 49/4 (2005) pp.563–67. This special issue of The Journal of Conflict Resolution contains other useful articles on the subject: MacArtan Humphreys, ‘Natural Resources, Conflict, and Conflict Resolution: Uncovering the Mechanisms’; James Ron, ‘Paradigm in Distress? Primary Commodities and Civil War’; James D. Fearon, ‘Primary Commodity Exports and Civil War’; and Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler, ‘Resource Rents, Governance, and Conflict’.

54. For example, Patrick Hardouin and Reiner Weichhardt, ‘Terrorist Fund Raising Through Criminal Activities’, Journal of Money Laundering Control 9/3 (2006) pp.563–97.

55. Hagel (note 51); Princeton N. Lyman and J. Stephen Morrison, ‘The Terrorist Threat in Africa’, Foreign Affairs 83/1 (2004) pp.75–86; Stephen D. Krasner and Carlos Pascual, ‘Addressing State Failure’, Foreign Affairs 84/4 (2005) pp.153–63.

56. Francis Fukuyama, State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 2004) p.92. See also Madeline K. Albright, ‘Bridges, Bombs, or Bluster?’, Foreign Affairs 82/5 (2003) pp.2–19.

57. Robert I. Rotberg, ‘The Failure and Collapse of Nation-states: Breakdown, Prevention and Repair’ in R. Rotberg (ed.) When States Fail: Causes and Consequences (Princeton: Princeton UP 2004) p.42.

58. < www.africom.mil/AboutAFRICOM.asp> accessed 1 Feb. 2009.

59. Department for International Development (DfID), Fighting Poverty to Build a Safer World: A Strategy for Security and Development (London: DfID 2005) p.5.

60. OECD, ‘Principles for Good International Engagement in Fragile States’, OECD document DCD (2005) 11/REV.2 pp.8–10.

61. < www.freedomhouse.org/> accessed 1 Feb. 2009.

62. Marshall and Cole (note 10) pp.3 and 12.

63. Goldstone et al. (note 17) p.19.

64. Goldstone et al. (note 17) p.20.

65. Volker Krause and Susumu Suzuki, ‘Causes of Civil War in Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa: A Comparison’, Social Science Quarterly 86/1 (2005) pp.160–77; Pierre Englebert and James Ron, ‘Primary Commodities and War: Congo-Brazzaville's Ambivalent Resource Curse’, Comparative Politics 37/1 (2004) pp.61–68.

66. Edward D. Mansfield and Jack Snyder, ‘Prone to Violence. The Paradox of the Democratic Peace’, The National Interest (Winter 2005/06) p.39.

67. Roland Paris, At War's End. Building Peace After Civil Conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2004) p. ix.

68. Mansfield and Snyder (note 66) p.44.

69. Bhikhu Parakh, ‘The Cultural Particularity of Liberal Democracy’ in David Held (ed.) Prospects for Democracy: North, South, East, West (Cambridge: Polity Press 1996) p.169.

70. Hironaka (note 27).