853
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Understanding China’s LOTE learners’ perceptions and choices of LOTE(s) and English learning: a linguistic market perspective

&
Pages 394-411 | Received 30 Jun 2021, Accepted 09 Nov 2021, Published online: 25 Nov 2021
 

ABSTRACT

This study examines how China’s LOTE (languages other than English) students perceive English and their target languages as different types of linguistic capital with different values, and how they exercise their agency as micro level LPP (language planning and policy) actors in language learning. Data were gathered from in-depth interviews with 35 university students (including Hindi, Persian and Thai learners) and analysed through the lens of individual agency in language planning and policy, as well as the Bourdieusian constructs of linguistic capital and the linguistic market. The findings reveal that English is regarded as a requisite, while LOTE(s) is/are perceived as a plus by LOTE learners. It was also found that English learning seems to be a default choice among LOTE learners, while LOTE learning is more often an extra choice in their language learning investment. Such findings have a counter-intuitive implication, namely that without recognizing the role of LOTE learners as micro LPP agents and the gap between the individual needs of career development and the macro and meso level demands for high-level multilingual personnel, LOTE education planning and policy may contribute to the English domination over LOTE(s) rather than enhancing (supra-)national linguistic capacity and multilingual and multicultural diversity.

View correction statement:
Correction

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 It should be noted that most of the LOTE programmes, unlike the more commonly taught foreign language programmes (e.g. English, Arabic or Japanese), do not recruit students on a yearly basis; instead, student admission may be implemented biennially, triennially or quadrennially, varying from one department to another.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Juexuan Lu

Juexuan Lu is a PhD student of School of Foreign Languages, Tongji University. Her research interests include language learner agency, educational linguistics, and language policy and planning.

Qi Shen

Qi Shen is a full professor and director of Center for Language Planning and Global Governance, Tongji University, Shanghai, China. His research interests include language policy and planning, educational linguistics, and sociolinguistics.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.