Publication Cover
Sex Education
Sexuality, Society and Learning
Volume 20, 2020 - Issue 1
1,144
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Institutional and contextual obstacles to sexuality education policy implementation in Uganda

ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all
Pages 17-32 | Received 20 Jul 2018, Accepted 16 Apr 2019, Published online: 06 May 2019
 

ABSTRACT

The successful implementation of sexuality education policy for young people has been shown to depend on a sound legislative and institutional framework. This article shows that both institutional factors and contextual obstacles have impeded the implementation of sexuality education policy in Uganda. Qualitative research techniques were employed in the form of systematic document reviews and extensive field-work with 64 participants, of which 32 were in-depth interviews with policymakers and key stakeholders in Kampala and Mbarara districts. In addition, four focus group discussions (n = 32) were conducted with teachers. The analysis was carried out thematically and manually, using open and axial coding. It was found that policy success was primarily limited by two broad factors: firstly, by institutional weaknesses such as a lack of capacity, inadequate financial commitment, poor coordination between relevant ministries and ineffective monitoring, and regulatory frameworks; secondly, by social, cultural and religious norms that give informal power to religious and cultural leaders. Two strategies are suggested as potential ways forward: (i) a commitment to both the human and financial resources needed to monitor adolescent sexual, and reproductive health programmes, but more importantly (ii) the initiation of negotiations with cultural and religious leaders to yield more positive outcomes.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks go to VLIR-UOS for financial assistance. Our sincere gratitude is extended to Isaac Ahimbisiibwe and Clara Atuhaire who worked as research assistants on the project. We thank research participants for the time and willingness to take part in the study; ministry and district officials, teachers and health workers.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was funded by VLIR-UOS team project grant number ZEIN2015PR411.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.