343
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Adverse reactions related to proton pump inhibitors in pediatric population: an analysis of spontaneous reporting data

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 127-132 | Received 24 Apr 2021, Accepted 07 Sep 2021, Published online: 20 Sep 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Background

The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has increased in the last 10 years in children. Data regarding their safety profile are limited. The aim of this study was to analyze data from the Italian spontaneous reporting system (SRS) database to evaluate the incidence and characteristics of PPI-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in children.

Research design and methods

This was an observational, retrospective study analyzing PPI-related ADR reports in children in the Italian SRS database between January 1st, 2001, and December 31st, 2020. ADRs were coded according to the system organ class term level. Factors associated with ADR seriousness were investigated.

Results

Seventy spontaneous reports of ADRs related to PPIs were analyzed. Esomeprazole and lansoprazole caused the highest number of ADRs equally (27% respectively), and the most frequently reported ADRs presented with gastrointestinal (24%) and/or skin manifestations (21.3%). More than a half of PPI prescriptions were off label for pediatric population. Serious ADRs were 19 (27.1%). Serious ADRs were more frequent in reports presenting PPIs combined with other drugs in comparison to reports with PPI single therapies (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

PPI-related ADRs in children are mostly not serious, and combination therapy seems to be associated with ADR seriousness.

Declaration of interest

The author(s) have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Author contributions

V. Dipasquale, G. Cicala, F. Laganà and P. Cutroneo collected the data and organized the results. V. Dipasquale, G. Cicala and P. Cutroneo wrote the draft of the manuscript. G. Trimarchi performed the statistical analysis. E. Spina and C. Romano supervised writing of the manuscript and revised it critically for intellectual content. All authors made substantial contributions and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2021.1978975.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.