Ductal size indexed to weight and body surface area correlates with morbidities in preterm infants ≤32 weeks

Abstract

Objectives

To assess ductal size correlated to spontaneous closure, pharmacological or surgical treatment; to index ductal diameter to body weight and body surface area; to evaluate the morbidities.

Study design

Retrospective study on preterms ≤32 weeks, birth weight ≤1500 g, extremely low birth weight (ELBW) and very low birth weight (VLBW). Inclusion criteria: patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) with a diameter ≥1 millimeter (mm) at 72 h from birth; need for ibuprofen treatment on the basis of a hemodynamically significant ductus arteriosus (HsPDA).

Results

One hundred infants with the diagnosis of PDA have been included. We observed a prevalence of spontaneous closure in 34% of newborns (41.3% VLBW versus 26.7% ELBW). The percentage of response to a single course of ibuprofen was of 62% (68.5% ELBW versus 54.3% VLBW). The mean of absolute ductal diameter was of 2.26 ± 0.62 mm in ELBW and 2.18 ± 0.42 mm in VLBW. The indexing of ductus size to body weight demonstrated a higher value in ELBW than VLBW (2.76 ± 0.97 mm/kg versus 1.84 ± 0.40 mm/kg).

Conclusions

Our results confirmed that HsPDA can develop in presence of a ductus >1.5 mm as absolute value or >1.4 mm/kg as indexed to body weight. In ELBW infants the ductal size indexed for body weight and body surface area could be more predictive of spontaneous closure or need for pharmacological treatment compared to the absolute value of ductal size. A strong association between HsPDA and short- or long-term morbidities was confirmed particularly in ELBW

Keywords:

• Body surface area
• body weight
• patent ductus arteriosus
• preterms

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Authors contribution

DG, EG and FC did a substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; BG performed statistical analysis; PF, FMF and DA revised critically the manuscript for important intellectual content; all the authors approval the final version.