Evaluation of the right ventricle by echocardiography: particularities and major challenges

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Compared with the left ventricle (LV), the right ventricle (RV) is less suited for evaluation by echocardiography (ECHO). Nevertheless, RV ECHO-assessment has currently emerged as an important diagnostic tool with meaningful prognostic value and essential contribution to therapeutic decisions. Although significant progress has been made, including generation of higher-quality normative data, validation of several two-dimensional measurements and improvements in three-dimensional ECHO-techniques, many challenges in RV ECHO-assessment still persist.

Areas covered: This review discusses the particular challenges and limits in obtaining accurate measurements of RV anatomical and functional parameters and focuses primarily on the difficulties in proper interpretation of the highly load dependent RV ECHO-parameters which complicates the use of this valuable diagnostic and surveillance technique.

Expert commentary: There is increasing evidence that RV assessment in relation with its actual loading conditions by ECHO-derived composite variables, which either incorporate a certain functional parameter and load, or incorporate measures which reflect the relationship between RV dilation and RV load, considering also the right atrial pressure (i.e. ‘load adaptation index’), is particularly suited for clinical decision-making. Load dependency of RV ECHO-parameters must be taken into consideration especially in patients with advanced RV dysfunction scheduled for LV assist device implantation or lung transplantation.

KEYWORDS:

• Echocardiography
• right ventricle
• load-sensitivity of ventricular function
• heart failure
• ventricular assist devices
• pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties. Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.