1,747
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

MOICS, a novel classier deciphering immune heterogeneity and aid precise management of clear cell renal cell carcinoma at multiomics level

, , , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Article: 2345977 | Received 19 Feb 2024, Accepted 17 Apr 2024, Published online: 24 Apr 2024
 

ABSTRACT

Recent studies have indicated that the tumor immune microenvironment plays a pivotal role in the initiation and progression of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). However, the characteristics and heterogeneity of tumor immunity in ccRCC, particularly at the multiomics level, remain poorly understood. We analyzed immune multiomics datasets to perform a consensus cluster analysis and validate the clustering results across multiple internal and external ccRCC datasets; and identified two distinctive immune phenotypes of ccRCC, which we named multiomics immune-based cancer subtype 1 (MOICS1) and subtype 2 (MOICS2). The former, MOICS1, is characterized by an immune-hot phenotype with poor clinical outcomes, marked by significant proliferation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, fibroblasts, and high levels of immune inhibitory signatures; the latter, MOICS2, exhibits an immune-cold phenotype with favorable clinical characteristics, characterized by robust immune activity and high infiltration of endothelial cells and immune stimulatory signatures. Besides, a significant negative correlation between immune infiltration and angiogenesis were identified. We further explored the mechanisms underlying these differences, revealing that negatively regulated endopeptidase activity, activated cornification, and neutrophil degranulation may promote an immune-deficient phenotype, whereas enhanced monocyte recruitment could ameliorate this deficiency. Additionally, significant differences were observed in the genomic landscapes between the subtypes: MOICS1 exhibited mutations in TTN, BAP1, SETD2, MTOR, MUC16, CSMD3, and AKAP9, while MOICS2 was characterized by notable alterations in the TGF-β pathway. Overall, our work demonstrates that multi-immune omics remodeling analysis enhances the understanding of the immune heterogeneity in ccRCC and supports precise patient management.

This article is part of the following collections:
Integrating Computational Modeling in Cancer Biology and Therapy

Abbreviations

ccRCC=

clear cell renal cell carcinoma

MOICS=

multiomics immune-based cancer subtype

RCC=

Renal cancer cell

TIME=

tumor immunological microenvironment

ICIs=

immune checkpoint inhibitors

TMB=

tumor mutation burden

MSI=

microsatellite instability

CNV=

copy number variation

CPI=

Clustering Prediction Index

DEG=

differentially expressed gene

ssGSVA=

single-sample gene set enrichment analysis

GO=

Gene Ontology

KEGG=

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

GSEA=

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis

GSVA=

Gene Set Variation Analysis

TIDE=

Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion

CNA=

copy number alterations

GDSC=

Genomics of Cancer Drug Sensitivity

IC50=

half-maximal inhibitory concentration

RSFVH=

Random Survival Forest Variable Hunting

HR=

hazard ratio

MeTIL=

methylation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

RNAss=

RNA expression-based stemness index

ENHSS=

enhancer element stemness score

HRD=

homologous recombination deficiency

BP=

biological process

CC=

cellular compartment

MF=

molecular function

NTP=

nearest template prediction

OS=

Overall survival

PFS=

Progression-free survival

TBR=

TGFβ response

HLA=

human leukocyte antigens

EPAS1=

endothelial PAS domain protein 1

HIF-2α=

hypoxia-inducible factor 2-alpha.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Jianming Zeng (University of Macau), and all the members of his bioinformatics team, Biotrainee, for generously sharing their experience and codes. The use of the biorstudio high performance computing cluster (https://biorstudio.cloud) at Biotrainee and the shanghai HS Biotech Co., Ltd. for conducting the research reported in this paper.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Author contributions

Ying Liu, Lin Qi and Bicheng Ye performed formal analysis and contributed equally to this work. Aimin Jiang, Linhui Wang, Peng Luo and Le Qu designed this study. Anbang Wang, Juan Lu and Le Qu wrote the first draft. All listed authors have read and approved the final submitted version.

Consent for publication

All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Data availability statement

Access details of the public datasets used in this work can be found in the methods and materials section of the study.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/15384047.2024.2345977

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81902560, 81730073, 81872074 to Linhui Wang, 81772740 and 82173345 to Le Qu), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province for Distinguished Young Scholars (No. BK20200006 to Le Qu), China National Key Research and Development Program Stem Cell and Translational Research Key Projects (2018YFA0108300 to Le Qu).