1,453
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Report

Analysis of defective protein ubiquitylation associated to adriamycin resistant cells

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 2337-2344 | Received 08 May 2017, Accepted 29 Sep 2017, Published online: 20 Nov 2017
 

ABSTRACT

DNA damage activated by Adriamycin (ADR) promotes ubiquitin–proteasome system-mediated proteolysis by stimulating both the activity of ubiquitylating enzymes and the proteasome. In ADR-resistant breast cancer MCF7 (MCF7ADR) cells, protein ubiquitylation is significantly reduced compared to the parental MCF7 cells. Here, we used tandem ubiquitin-binding entities (TUBEs) to analyze the ubiquitylation pattern observed in MCF7 or MCF7ADR cells. While in MCF7, the level of total ubiquitylation increased up to six-fold in response to ADR, in MCF7ADR cells only a two-fold response was found. To further explore these differences, we looked for cellular factors presenting ubiquitylation defects in MCF7ADR cells. Among them, we found the tumor suppressor p53 and its ubiquitin ligase, Mdm2. We also observed a drastic decrease of proteins known to integrate the TUBE-associated ubiquitin proteome after ADR treatment of MCF7 cells, like histone H2AX, HMGB1 or β-tubulin. Only the proteasome inhibitor MG132, but not the autophagy inhibitor chloroquine partially recovers the levels of total protein ubiquitylation in MCF7ADR cells. p53 ubiquitylation is markedly increased in MCF7ADR cells after proteasome inhibition or a short treatment with the isopeptidase inhibitor PR619, suggesting an active role of these enzymes in the regulation of this tumor suppressor. Notably, MG132 alone increases apoptosis of MCF7ADR and multidrug resistant ovarian cancer A2780DR1 and A2780DR2 cells. Altogether, our results highlight the use of ubiquitylation defects to predict resistance to ADR and underline the potential of proteasome inhibitors to treat these chemoresistant cells.

List of abbreviations

ADR=

Adriamycin

CQ=

Chloroquine

DUBs=

Deubiquitylating enzymes

TUBEs=

Tandem ubiquitin-binding entities

UPS=

Ubiquitin–proteasome system

UBDs=

ubiquitin-binding domains

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts interests.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Gant for providing the cell lines used in this study and laboratory members for technical support and helpful suggestions. We also thank Dr. J.E. Sarry for facilitating the access to their facilities.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competiveness (MINECO, CTQ2011- 27874 grant), the Government of the Basque Country, (Etortek grants 2013, 2014), Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa (VL, FA) Saiotek program (FA, MSR) and grant 2016/22/E/ NZ5/00381 from the Polish National Science Centre (RJ).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.