Simulated Transfer of Liquids and Powders from Hands and Clothing to the Mouth

Abstract

A series of laboratory experiments was carried out to assess transfer of liquids (vinegar) and powders (calcium acetate and magnesium carbonate) from hands, arms, gloves, respirators, clothing, and pens to the oral cavity or the perioral area (the area surrounding the mouth). Experiments were carried out with four volunteers. The donor area (the hands, arms, gloves, and so on) was loaded with a known mass of the test substance and was then brought into contact the receiver area (the oral cavity or the perioral area). The percentage of the substance on the donor that transferred to the receiver (the transfer efficiency or TE) was assessed using saliva samples and gauze wipes of the perioral area. Magnesium carbonate was measured on gauze and in saliva using inductively coupled plasma/atomic emission spectrometry. Calcium acetate and vinegar were measured using ion chromatography/electrochemical detection. Average transfer efficiencies were calculated for each substance and transfer scenario; these were compared using ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Overall, direct transfer from the hands to the oral cavity was significantly higher (mean TE = 51.6) than indirect transfer from the hands to the oral cavity via the perioral area by licking the lips (mean TE = 11.5). The results suggested higher TEs for liquids than for solids and that hand-to-mouth TEs may increase with water solubility. Transfer from bare arms to the perioral area was higher than from arms covered by cotton sleeves for both liquids and powders. Although TE data are often required by models estimating exposure by inadvertent ingestion, relatively few published data are available. This study has provided evidence of some factors that may influence transfer of chemicals from hands or objects to the mouth (physical form, use of clothing, and so on) and has provided data that are essential for the development of predictive exposure models of inadvertent ingestion exposure.

Keywords:

• transfer efficiency
• inadvertent ingestion
• exposure assessment
• exposure modeling
• dermal exposure
• hand-to-mouth
• object-to-mouth
• unintentional exposure
• non-dietary ingestion

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors wish to thank the volunteers who participated in the experiments. They would also like to thank David Todd, Jean Forbes, and Jennifer Gray who carried out the chemical analysis; Laura MacCalman who provided input to the statistical analysis and comments on the final manuscript; and Andrew Apsley for his comments on the manuscript. The work was funded by the Health and Safety Executive.