Publication Cover
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance
Volume 14, 2018 - Issue 3
1,591
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Towards standardisation of proof load testing: pilot test on viaduct Zijlweg

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 365-380 | Received 19 Nov 2016, Accepted 23 Apr 2017, Published online: 26 Jul 2017
 

Abstract

Proof load tests of bridges can be very useful for structures with a lack of information, or for structures of which the effect of material degradation is difficult to assess. Contrary to diagnostic load testing, proof load testing is not well-defined in current standards in terms of required load and analysis of measurements. The risk related to the high loads used in proof load testing requires standardisation for these tests. The paper highlights important considerations for proof load testing that may lead to the development of guidelines in the Netherlands, by illustrating a pilot study on the viaduct Zijlweg in the Netherlands. This reinforced concrete bridge rates too low in shear. Topics of interest are the required load that the bridge has to withstand to be approved by the load test and the interpretation of the measurements during the test to avoid permanent damage to the structure. These measurements were compared to the stop criteria from existing codes for buildings, to examine if recommendations for the use with bridges can be formulated. The final result of the test on this case study is that the capacity of the viaduct is proven to be sufficient for shear and bending moment.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their gratitude and sincere appreciation to the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment (Rijkswaterstaat) and the Province of Noord Brabant for financing this research work. The contributions and help of our colleagues Albert Bosman, Cor van der Veen, and Yuguang Yang, and students Arthur Ennouri and Werner Vos of Delft University of Technology, of Witteveen+Bos, responsible for the logistics and safety, and of Mammoet, responsible for applying the load, are gratefully acknowledged. The fruitful discussions with Frank Linthorst and Danny den Boef of Witteveen+Bos and with Otto Illing and the late Chris Huissen of Mammoet are acknowledged.