111
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Device profile of the Ambicor two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis for treatment of erectile dysfunction: overview of its safety and efficacy

, , &
Pages 9-14 | Received 16 Oct 2020, Accepted 17 Nov 2020, Published online: 01 Dec 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Erectile dysfunction is one of the most common forms of male sexual dysfunction worldwide. Over the past several decades, the inflatable penile prosthesis has emerged as the gold standard surgical treatment for refractory erectile dysfunction. The vast majority of current penile implants are three-piece inflatable penile prostheses. However, the design of the two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis offers certain advantages for both the patient and surgeon, and may be the preferred penile implant for certain patient populations.

Areas covered: The Ambicor two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (Men’s Health Division, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) was introduced in 1994 by American Medical Systems (Minnetonka, MN, USA, now a subsidiary of Boston Scientific) and received further design improvements in 1998 to address early mechanical issues with the device. Currently, the Ambicor is the only two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis available in the United States. This review article aims to provide an overview of the Ambicor device and summarize the best available clinical data regarding outcomes and safety.

Expert opinion: While two-piece devices account for a small minority of current penile implants, the Ambicor should be considered a safe, reliable, and effective option for appropriately selected patients with the advantage of avoiding blind reservoir placement.

Declaration of interest

L Levine is a speaker and consultant for Boston Scientific and for Coloplast. All other authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript.

Reviewer disclosures

One peer reviewer is a consultant/advisor for Boston Scientific. Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no other relevant financial relationships or otherwise to disclose.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.