Device profile of the Ambicor two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis for treatment of erectile dysfunction: overview of its safety and efficacy

References

• NIH Consensus Conference. Impotence. NIH consensus development panel on impotence. JAMA. 1993;270(1):83–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman HA, Goldstein I, Hatzichristou DG, et al. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts male aging study. J Urol. 1994;151(1):54–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althof SE. Quality of life and erectile dysfunction. Urology. 2002;59(6):803–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swindle RW, Cameron AE, Lockhart DC, et al. The psychological and interpersonal relationship scales: assessing psychological and relationship outcomes associated with erectile dysfunction and its treatment. Arch Sex Behav. 2004;33(1):19–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine LA, Becher E, Bella A, et al. Penile prosthesis surgery: current recommendations from the international consultation on sexual medicine. J Sex Med. 2016;13(4):489–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ralph D, Gonzalez-Cadavid N, Mirone V, et al. The management of Peyronie’s disease: evidence-based 2010 guidelines. J Sex Med. 2010;7(7):2359–2374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Management of erectile impotence. Use of implantable inflatable prosthesis. Urology. 1973;2(1):80–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levine LA, Estrada CR, Morgentaler A. Mechanical reliability and safety of, and patient satisfaction with the Ambicor inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a 2 center study. J Urol. 2001;166(3):932–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montague DK. Penile prosthesis implantation in the era of medical treatment for erectile dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am. 2011;38(2):217–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoebeke PB, Decaestecker K, Beysens M, et al. Erectile implants in female-to-male transsexuals: our experience in 129 patients. Eur Urol. 2010;57(2):334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuville P, Morel-Journel N, Maucourt-Boulch D, et al. surgical outcomes of erectile implants after phalloplasty: retrospective analysis of 95 procedures. j sex med. 2016;13(11):1758–1764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darouiche RO. Treatment of infections associated with surgical implants. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(14):1422–1429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baas W, O’Connor B, Welliver C, et al. Worldwide trends in penile implantation surgery: data from over 63,000 implants. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(1):31–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moses RA, Anderson RE, Kim J, et al. Erectile dysfunction management after failed phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitor trial: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Transl Androl Urol. 2019;8(4):387–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DJ, Najari BB, Davison WL, et al. Trends in the utilization of penile prostheses in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in the United States. J Sex Med. 2015;12(7):1638–1645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayta IA, McKinlay JB, Krane RJ. The likely worldwide increase in erectile dysfunction between 1995 and 2025 and some possible policy consequences. BJU Int. 1999;84(1):50–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal RL, Camper SB, Burnett AL. Modern utilization of penile prosthesis surgery: a national claim registry analysis. Int J Impot Res. 2014;26(5):167–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fein RL. The G.F.S. Mark II inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1992;147(1):66–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy JJ. The development of modern penile implants. Sex Med Rev. 2016;4(2):177–189.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lux M, Reyes-Vallejo L, Morgentaler A, et al. Outcomes and satisfaction rates for the redesigned 2-piece penile prosthesis. J Urol. 177(1): 262–266. 2007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoudary KP, Morgentaler A. Design considerations in penile prostheses: the American medical systems product line. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 1997;7(1):55–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The AMS Ambicor penile prosthesis operating room manual. Minnetonka, MN: American Medical Systems; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Henry GD. The Henry mummy wrap and the Henry finger sweep surgical techniques. J Sex Med. 2009;6(3):619–622.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ko OS, Bennett NE Jr. Ambicor two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis: background and contemporary outcomes. Sex Med Rev. 2018;6(2):319–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry GD, Karpman E, Brant W, et al. The who, how and what of real-world penile implantation in 2015: the PROPPER registry baseline data. J Urol. 2016;195(2):427–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, et al. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997;49(6):822–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cayan S, Aşcı R, Efesoy O, et al. Comparison of long-term results and couples’ satisfaction with penile implant types and brands: lessons learned from 883 patients with erectile dysfunction who underwent penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med. 16(7): 1092–1099. 2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayrak O, Erturhan S, Seckiner I, et al. Comparison of the patient’s satisfaction underwent penile prosthesis; malleable versus Ambicor: single center experience. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 92(1): 25–29. 2020.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abdelsayed GA, Levine LA. Ambicor 2-piece inflatable penile prosthesis: who and how? J Sex Med. 2018;15(3):410–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natali A, Olianas R, Fisch M. Penile implantation in Europe: successes and complications with 253 implants in Italy and Germany. J Sex Med. 2008;5(6):1503–1512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trost L, Hellstrom WJ. History, contemporary outcomes, and future of penile prostheses: a review of the literature. Sex Med Rev. 2013;1(3):150–163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gentile G, Franceschelli A, Massenio P, et al. Patient’s satisfaction after 2-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: an Italian multicentric study. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 88(1): 1–3. 2016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mulcahy JJ, Carson CC 3rd. Long-term infection rates in diabetic patients implanted with antibiotic-impregnated versus nonimpregnated inflatable penile prostheses: 7-year outcomes. Eur Urol. 2011;60(1):167–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deveci S, Martin D, Parker M, et al. Penile length alterations following penile prosthesis surgery. Eur Urol. 2007;51(4):1128–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar