Facilitating progress in health behaviour theory development and modification: the reasoned action approach as a case study

Abstract

This paper explores the question: what are barriers to health behaviour theory development and modification, and what potential solutions can be proposed? Using the reasoned action approach (RAA) as a case study, four areas of theory development were examined: (1) the theoretical domain of a theory; (2) tension between generalisability and utility, (3) criteria for adding/removing variables in a theory, and (4) organisational tracking of theoretical developments and formal changes to theory. Based on a discussion of these four issues, recommendations for theory development are presented, including: (1) the theoretical domain for theories such as RAA should be clarified; (2) when there is tension between generalisability and utility, utility should be given preference given the applied nature of the health behaviour field; (3) variables should be formally removed/amended/added to a theory based on their performance across multiple studies and (4) organisations and researchers with a stake in particular health areas may be best suited for tracking the literature on behaviour-specific theories and making refinements to theory, based on a consensus approach. Overall, enhancing research in this area can provide important insights for more accurately understanding health behaviours and thus producing work that leads to more effective health behaviour change interventions.

Keywords:

• health behaviour theory
• theory development
• theory of reasoned action

This article is referred to by:

Life and death of health behaviour theories

Improving translational research in building theory: a commentary on Head and Noar

Who has the authority to change a theory? Everyone! A commentary on Head and Noar

This article is related to:

Mind the gap: bringing our theories in line with the empirical data – a response to commentaries