2,656
Views
47
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

The association between implicit attitudes toward physical activity and physical activity behaviour: a systematic review and correlational meta-analysis

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 248-276 | Received 09 Nov 2018, Accepted 10 May 2019, Published online: 12 Jun 2019
 

ABSTRACT

As a result of recent calls to attend to the implicit processes that regulate health behaviours, the study of implicit attitudes and physical activity behaviour has grown rapidly in the past decade. The aim of this study was to summarise existing evidence on the extent to which implicit attitudes toward physical activity are associated with physical activity behaviour. A systematic literature review was performed to retrieve studies reporting both a measure of implicit attitudes and physical activity. For the meta-analysis, effect size (Pearson’s r) were extracted from eligible studies or retrieved from authors. A total of 26 independent studies, and 55 effect sizes, were eligible. There was a small, significant, and positive correlation between implicit attitudes and physical activity, a finding replicated across multiple meta-analytical strategies with sensitivity analyses applied. This association was not significantly moderated by study design or objective, participants’ age or other characteristics, or measures of implicit attitudes or physical activity. This meta-analysis provides evidence that implicit attitudes toward physical activity are positively associated with physical activity in adults to a small degree.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thanks the Drs Franzisca Antoniewicz, Carolin Muschalik, Tanya Berry, Julie Boiché, Matthias Bluemke, Austin Baldwin and Ralph Brand for providing us the necessary information for the meta-analysis. PB is supported by Université du Québec à Montréal, Institut Universitaire de Santé Mentale de Montréal and by a salary award from the Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 We used the term implicit here knowingly that there is no consensus yet in the literature regarding terminology. The term ‘implicit’ can also refer to other terms like: type-1 processes, associative, automatic, impulsive; while the term ‘explicit’ refers to: type-2 processes, propositional, controlled, reflective. Although we acknowledge the controversy, this debate of terminology is not within the scope of this review and will not be further discussed.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.