Publication Cover
Global Public Health
An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice
Volume 15, 2020 - Issue 9
413
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

‘PrEP should be for men only’: Young heterosexual men’s views on PrEP in rural South Africa

ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 1337-1348 | Received 21 Nov 2019, Accepted 02 Mar 2020, Published online: 24 Mar 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Gaps persist in HIV testing, treatment, and prevention services for men, leading to higher attributable mortality compared to women. We sought to characterise HIV prevention knowledge, risk behaviours, and interest in pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among young men in rural South Africa. Methods: We conducted interviews with HIV-negative heterosexual men which were thematically analysed to identify key themes. Results: Among 31 participants, median age was 26 (IQR23–31), 77% were unemployed, 52% reported previous STI, 84% reported casual sexual partners. Men acknowledged inconsistent condom use with multiple partners, reporting high-risk sexual behaviour despite recognised risk. Mistrust between partners was common. Respondents reported willingness to take PrEP to protect themselves and their partner, though anticipated stigma and structural barriers. Men worried that if their female partner had PrEP, she would become sexually active with others. Conclusions: In rural South Africa, young heterosexual men acknowledged high HIV-risk behaviour, expressed concern about acquiring HIV, and recognised the value of PrEP. Men were often not supportive of their female partners taking PrEP. Implementing HIV prevention services needs to incorporate young men’s perspectives and may require gender-specific interventions, including addressing stigma, differentiated service delivery models such as community-based services or adapting facility services to target men.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the staff at Church of Scotland Hospital and Philanjalo NGO for their dedication to the Msinga community.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The study was funded by Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (AH, JL #2016178; SS #2015216), Irene Diamond Foundation (#2006078).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.