38
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Keratoconus: advances in anterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques

, , &
Pages 59-66 | Received 20 Nov 2019, Accepted 08 Feb 2020, Published online: 19 Feb 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) is nowadays considered the gold standard for the surgical treatment of keratoconus thanks to the lower rate of complications compared to conventional penetrating keratoplasty (PK). However, the learning curve and the suboptimal quality of donor-recipient interface still remain debated issues.

Areas covered: To date, big-bubble DALK (BB-DALK) is the most widely performed technique. However, the introduction of femtosecond laser has given new impulse to the standardization of DALK, but also new drawbacks to deal with. Furthermore, the recent redefinition of corneal anatomy understanding along with the introduction of novel techniques have provided further advantages in terms of success rate and postoperative visual outcomes.

Expert commentary: Although DALK is still dependent on single surgeon experience and skills, techniques and tools employed are quickly evolving thus improving surgical outcomes. However, to date, there is no universal consensus about alternative options in case of BB-DALK failure as well as management of intra-operative complications.

Article highlights

  • DALK provides several advantages over PK for the treatment of keratoconus

  • The most popular techniques to perform DALK is BB-DALK

  • Current limitations of DALK learning curve and interface quality

  • New technologies such as femtosecond laser could open new scenario for DALK.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer Disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial relationships or otherwise to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This paper is not funded.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.