38
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Keratoconus: advances in anterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques

, , &
Pages 59-66 | Received 20 Nov 2019, Accepted 08 Feb 2020, Published online: 19 Feb 2020

References

  • Romero-Jimenez M, Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn JS. Keratoconus: a review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010;33:157–166.
  • Naroo SA. Contact lens & anterior eye. J Br Contact Lens Assoc. 2008;31:173–175.
  • Bawazeer AM, Hodge WG, Lorimer B. Atopy and keratoconus: a multivariate analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:834–836.
  • Georgiou T, Funnell CL, Cassels-Brown A, et al. Influence of ethnic origin on the incidence of keratoconus and associated atopic disease in Asians and White patients. Eye (Lond). 2004;18:379–383.
  • Facts About the Cornea and Corneal Disease. NEI office of science communications, Public Liaison, and Education. [ cited 2018 Jan 1]. Available from: https://www.nei.nih.gov/health/cornealdisease
  • Jonas JB, Nangia V, Matin A, et al. Prevalence and associations of keratoconus in rural Maharashtra in central India: the central India eye and medical study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148:760–765.
  • Kennedy RH, Bourne WM, Dyer JA. A 48-year clinical and epidemiologic study of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101:267–273.
  • Henein C, Nanavaty MA. Systematic review comparing penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for management of keratoconus. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017;40(1):3–14.
  • Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42:297–319.
  • Giannaccare G, Weiss JS, Sapigni L, et al. Immunologic stromal rejection after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with grafts of a larger size (9 mm) for various stromal diseases. Cornea. 2018;37(8):967–972.
  • Busin M, Zambianchi L, Arffa RC. Microkeratome-assisted lamellar keratoplasty for the surgical treatment of keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(6):987–997.
  • Reinhart WJ, Musch DC, Jacobs DS, et al. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty a report by the American Academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:209–218.
  • Guan M, Zhao W, Zhang Y, et al. Graft survival rate of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(28):e11404.
  • Gonzalez A, Price MO, Feng MT, et al. Immunologic rejection episodes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: incidence and risk factors. Cornea. 2017;36:1076–1082.
  • Borderie VM, Guilbert E, Touzeau O, et al. Graft rejection and graft failure after anterior lamellar versus penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151:1024–1029.
  • Cohen AW, Goins KM, Sutphin JE, et al. Penetrating keratoplasty versus deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for the treatment of keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol. 2010;30(6):675–681.
  • Javadi MA, Feizi S, Yazdani S, et al. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a clinical trial. Cornea. 2010;29(4):365–371.
  • Han DCY, Mehta JS, Por YM, et al. Comparison of outcomes of lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148:744–751.
  • Ardjomand N, Hau S, McAlister JC, et al. Quality of vision and graft thickness in deep anterior lamellar and penetrating corneal allografts. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(2):228–235.
  • Archila EA. Deep lamellar keratoplasty dissection of host tissue with intrastromal air injection. Cornea. 1984;3:217–218.
  • Amayem AF, Anwar M. Fluid lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:76–79.
  • Himmura S, Shimazaki J, Omoto M, et al. Deep lamellar keratoplasty (DLKP) in keratoconus patients using viscoadaptive viscoelastics. Cornea. 2005;24:178–181.
  • Manche EE, Holland GN, Maloney RK. Deep lamellar keratoplasty using viscoelastic dissection. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1561–1565.
  • Melles GR, Remeijer L, Geerards AJ, et al. A quick surgical technique for deep, anterior lamellar keratoplasty using visco-dissection. Cornea. 2000;19:427–432.
  • Anwar M, Teichmann KD. Deep lamellar keratoplasty: surgical techniques for anterior lamellar keratoplasty with and without baring of Descemet’s membrane. Cornea. 2002;21:374–383.
  • Dua HS, Faraj LA, Said DG, et al. Human corneal anatomy redefined: a novel pre- Descemet’s layer (Dua’s layer). Ophthalmology. 2013;120:1778–1785.
  • Abdelkader A, Kaufman HE. Descemetic versus pre-descemetic lamellar keratoplasty: clinical and confocal study. Cornea. 2011;30(11):1244–1252.
  • AlTaan SL, Mohammed I, Said DG, et al. Air pressure changes in the creation and bursting of the type-1 big bubble in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: an ex vivo study. Eye. 2018;32(1):146–151.
  • Dua HS, Faraj LA, Said DG. Dua’s layer: its discovery, characteristics and clinical ap-plications. In: Del Buey A, Sayas MA, et al., editors. Biomechanica y arquitetura corneal. Barcelona: Elsevier; 2014. p. 35–47.
  • Han DC, Mehta JS, Por YM, et al. Comparison of outcomes of lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148:744–751.
  • Feizi S, Javadi MA, Mohammad-Rabei H. An analysis of factors influencing quality of vision after big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;162:66–73.
  • Fontana L, Parente G, Sincich A, et al. Influence of graft-host interface on the quality of vision after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Cornea. 2011;30(5):497–502.
  • Borderie VM, Sandali O, Bullet J, et al. Long-term results of deep anterior lamellar versus penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:249–255.
  • Myerscough J, Friehmann A, Bovone C, et al. Management of type 2 bubble formed during big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 2019;38(6):e20.
  • Goweida MB, Ragab AM, Liu C. Management of type 2 bubble formed during big bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 2019;38(2):189–193.
  • Goweida MB, Ragab AM, Liu C. Reply. Cornea. 2019;38(6):e20–e21.
  • Borderie VM, Touhami S, Georgeon C, et al. Predictive factors for successful type 1 big bubble during deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. J Ophthalmol. 2018;13(2018):4685406.S.
  • Feizi S, Javadi MA, Daryabari SH. Factors influencing big-bubble formation during deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(5):622–625.
  • Scorcia V, Giannaccare G, Lucisano A, et al. Predictors of bubble formation and type obtained with pneumatic dissection during deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019. DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2019.12.012.
  • Chaurasia S, Ramappa M. In vitro study of air bubble dynamics following pneumodissection of donor corneas and relationship of air bubble pattern with a peripheral paracentesis incision. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(12):1738–1741.
  • Scorcia V, Lucisano A, Pietropaolo R, et al. Red reflex-guided big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: a simple technique to judge dissection depth. Cornea. 2015;34(9):1035–1038.
  • Busin M, Scorcia V, Leon P, et al. Outcomes of air injection within 2 mm inside a deep trephination for deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in eyes with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;164:6–13.
  • Coster DJ, Lowe MT, Keane MC, et al. Australian corneal graft registry con-tributors. A comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes: a registry study. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:979–987.
  • Chen G, Tzekov R, Li W, et al. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cornea. 2016;35:169–174.
  • Keane M, Coster D, Ziaei M, Williams K. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for treating keratoconus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;CD009700.
  • Sutphin JE, Goins KM, Wagoner MD. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: when should it replace penetrating keratoplasty? Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148:629–631.
  • Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Ku¨chle M, et al. Impact of graft diameter on corneal power and the regularity of post- keratoplasty astigmatism before and after suture removal. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:2162–2167.
  • Huang T, Hu Y, Gui M, et al. Large-diameter deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus: visual and refractive outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:1196–1200.
  • Skeens HM, Holland EJ. Large-diameter penetrating keratoplasty: indications and outcomes. Cornea. 2010;29:296–301.
  • Busin M, Leon P, Nahum Y, et al. Large (9 mm) deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with clearance of a 6-mm optical zone optimizes outcomes of keratoconus surgery. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(7):1072–1080.
  • Busin M, Madi S, Scorcia V, et al. A two-piece microkeratome-assisted mushroom keratoplasty improves the outcomes and survival of grafts performed in eyes with diseased stroma and healthy endothelium (an American Ophthalmological Society Thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2015;113:T11–T122.
  • Farid M, Steinert RF. Femtosecond laser-assisted corneal surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010;21:288–292.
  • Bermansson JP, Goosey JD, Chirag KP, et al. Recurrence or re-emergence of keratoconus - what is the evidence telling us? Literature review and two case reports. Ocul Surf. 2014;12:267–272.
  • Scorcia V, De Luca V, Lucisano A, et al. Results of viscobubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty after failure of pneumatic dissection. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102:1288–1292.
  • Muftuoglu O, Toro P, Hogan RN, et al. Sarnicola air-visco bubble technique in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 2013;32:527–532.
  • Scorcia V, De Luca V, Lucisano A, et al. Comparison of corneal densitometry between big-bubble and visco-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019. DOI:10.11.36/bjophthalmol-2018-313509.
  • Durrie DS, Kezirian GM. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:120–126.
  • Chan CC, Ritenour RJ, Kumar NL, et al. Femtosecond laser-assisted mushroom con-figuration deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 2010;29:290–295.
  • Salouti R, Zamani M, Ghoreyshi M, et al. Comparison between manual trephination versus femtosecond laser-assisted deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(12):1716–1723.
  • Bleriot A, Martin E, Lebranchu P, et al. Comparison of anatomic and functional results between Z6 femtosecond laser-assisted and manual trephination in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for advanced keratoconus. J Fr Ophthalmol. 2017;40(7):571–579.
  • Zhang C, Liu L, Tang M, et al. Laboratory evaluation of femtosecond laser lamellar cuts in gamma-irradiated corneas. Cornea. 2015;34(11):1499–1503.
  • Kopani KR, Page MA, Holiman J, et al. Femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty: full and partial-thickness cut wound strength and endothelial cell loss across a variety of wound patterns. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(7):894–899.
  • Vetter JM, Butsch C, Faust M, et al. Irregularity of the posterior corneal surface after curved interface femtosecond laser-assisted versus microkeratome-assisted Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2013;32(2):118–124.
  • Guindolet D, Nguyen DT, Bergin C, et al. Double-docking technique for femtosecond laser-assisted deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 2018;37(1):123–126.
  • Jaycock PD, Jones MN, Males J, et al. Outcomes of same-sizing versus oversizing donor trephines in keratoconic patients undergoing first penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(2):268–275.
  • Laibson PR. Current concepts and techniques in corneal transplantation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2002;13(4):220–223.
  • Busin M, Monks T, Al-Nawaiseh I. Different suture techniques variously affect the regularity of post-keratoplasty astigmatism. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1200–1205.
  • Sandali O, El Sanharawi M, Temstet C, et al. Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography imaging in keratoconus: a corneal structural classification. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(12):2403–2412.
  • Schaub F, Enders P, Bachmann BO, et al. Effect of corneal collagen crosslinking on subsequent deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in keratoconus. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;255(4):811–816.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.