445
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Biological durability of pine wood

&
Pages 1050-1064 | Received 05 May 2022, Accepted 18 Jul 2022, Published online: 08 Aug 2022
 

ABSTRACT

The genus Pinus represents more than a hundred different tree species, most of them forming stems that can be commercially utilised for both timber and wood pulp industry. Pines are native to most of the Northern Hemisphere, while introduced and often naturalized in the Southern Hemisphere. The sapwood of pines is considered ‘not durable’ but generally easy to impregnate. On the contrary, the coloured heartwood of pines is difficult to impregnate and considered ‘less to moderately durable’ against decay fungi, but due to varying content and composition of extractives, both moisture performance and inherent durability vary within and between species. This study reviewed the literature to quantify the extent of variability of pine wood and its potential causes. Literature data from durability tests performed under laboratory and field conditions made it possible to compile reference factors for 26 pine species. The inter-species variation of biological durability is more prominent in above-ground exposure (0.7–14.9 times higher compared to the non-durable pine sapwood) compared to soil contact scenarios (1.0–2.4). The latter might be explained by fungicidal and hydrophobic extractives of pines, which play a more dominant role in above-ground exposure compared to soil exposure with permanent wetting.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

The authors received funding in the frame of the research project CLICKdesign, which is supported under the umbrella of ERA-NET Cofund ForestValue by the Ministry of Education, Science and Sport (MIZS)—Slovenia; The Ministry of the Environment (YM)—Finland; The Forestry Commissioners (FC)—United Kingdom; Research Council of Norway (RCN, 297899)—Norway; The French Environment and Energy Management Agency (ADEME) and The French National Research Agency (ANR)—France; The Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (FORMAS), Swedish Energy Agency (SWEA), Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems (Vinnova)—Sweden; Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) and Agency for Renewable Resources (FNR)—Germany. ForestValue has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N° 773324. Parts of this research were funded from the ongoing research project DURATEST (2219NR372), supported by the German Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) via the Agency for Renewable Resources (FNR).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.