Canadian manufacturer and technician perspectives on the design and use of augmentative and alternative communication technology

Abstract

Purpose

Device manufacturers and technicians (MaTs) of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems play key roles in the design and successful uptake of communication devices. This study aims to investigate MaT perspectives on AAC device design and effective use.

Materials and Methods

To investigate their perspectives, a focus group of MaTs within Canada was conducted. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze data.

Findings

Three major themes resulted from analysis, which reflect MaT’s views: AAC hardware and software flexibility, AAC knowledge and implementation, and social good versus financial resources.

Conclusions

This study provides insights into the complexities faced by MaTs in balancing technical support of system end-users and the financial resources necessary for that support. These insights indicate a need for increased financial resources and the expansion of individuals who qualify for AAC system candidacy. MaTs suggest that an increase in resources and candidacy could lead to more successful AAC implementation and a greater understanding of AAC for all stakeholders.

Implications For Rehabilitation

• Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC):

• • AAC technology provides individuals with communication disabilities a form of alternative communication.

• • The success of AAC systems is dependent on multiple factors including AAC stakeholders, system design, and system implementation.

• • This study explores AAC manufacturers and technicians perspectives on how to make AAC systems as effective and widely accessible as possible.

Keywords:

• Augmentative and alternative communication
• manufacturers
• technicians
• flexibility
• design
• implementation
• financial resources

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was funded by Government of Canada’s Accessibility Standards Canada Research Grant.