186
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Canadian manufacturer and technician perspectives on the design and use of augmentative and alternative communication technology

, , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Received 02 Mar 2023, Accepted 20 Jul 2023, Published online: 02 Aug 2023

References

  • Loncke F. Augmentative and alternative communication: models and applications (2 ed.). San Diego (CA): Plural Publishing, Inc.; 2022.
  • Taherian S, Davies C. Multiple stakeholder perceptions of assistive technology for individuals with cerebral palsy in New Zealand. Disab Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(7):648–657. doi:10.1080/17483107.2017.1369585.
  • Alzrayer NM. Transitioning from a low- to high-tech augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) system: effects on augmented and vocal requesting. Augment Altern Commun. 2020;36(3):155–165. doi:10.1080/07434618.2020.1813196.
  • DiGiovine CP, Donahue M, Bahr P, et al. Rehabilitation engineers, technologists, and technicians: vital members of the assistive technology team. Assist Technol. 2023;35(1):23–34. doi:10.1080/10400435.2018.1454713.
  • Polat H, Delialioglu O. Design specifications of augmentative and alternative communication apps for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. IJTE. 2023;6(1):19–36. doi:10.46328/ijte.396.
  • Demasco P. Human factors considerations in the design of language interfaces in AAC. Assist Technol. 1994;6(1):10–25. doi:10.1080/10400435.1994.10132224.
  • Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America [Internet]. 2023 https://www.resna.org/.
  • Americans with Disabilities Act. U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division [Internet]. 2023. https://www.ada.gov/
  • Accessibility Standards Canada Augmentative and Alternative Communication Project [Internet]. Queen’s University. 2023. https://live.wp3.its.queensu.ca/ascwww/.
  • Powell RA, Single HM. Focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 1996;8(5):499–504. doi:10.1093/intqhc/8.5.499.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2019;11(4):589–597. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.
  • Johnson JM, Inglebret E, Jones C, et al. Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augment Altern Commun. 2006;22(2):85–99. doi:10.1080/07434610500483588.
  • Volberda HW. Toward the flexible form: how to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organization Science. 1996;7(4):359–374. doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.359.
  • Griffiths T, Clarke M, Price K. Augmentative and alternative communication for children with speech, language and communication needs. Paediatr Child Health. 2022;32(8):277–281. doi:10.1016/j.paed.2022.05.001.
  • McNaughton D, Light J, Beukelman DR, et al. Building capacity in AAC: a person-centred approach to supporting participation by people with complex communication needs. Augment Altern Commun. 2019;35(1):56–68. doi:10.1080/07434618.2018.1556731.
  • Stein S, Kohut T, Dillenburger K. The importance of sexuality education for children with and without intellectual disabilities: what parents think. Sex Disabil. 2018;36(2):141–148. doi:10.1007/s11195-017-9513-9.
  • McEachern D. The key areas of effective design and use of augmentative & alternative communication. Paper presented at: Assistive Technology Industry Association Conference; Orlando, FL, 2023.
  • Lindsay S. Perceptions of health care workers prescribing augmentative and alternative communication devices to children. Disab Rehab Assist Technol. 2010;5(3):209–222.
  • Moorcroft A, Scarinci N, Meyer C. We were just kind of handed it and then it was smoke bombed by everyone’: How do external stakeholders contribute to parent rejection and abandonment of AAC systems. Inter J Language Commun Disor. 2020;55(1):59–69. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12502.
  • Marmot M, Goldblatt P, Allen J. Fair society, healthy lives (The Marmot Review). 2010.
  • Schoenmaker D, Schramade W. Investing for long-term value creation. J Sustain Finan Investment. 2019;9(4):356–377. doi:10.1080/20430795.2019.1625012.
  • Schuh G, Frank J, Jussen P, et al. Monetizing industry 4.0: design principles for subscription business in the manufacturing industry. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation; Valbonne Sophia-Antipolis, FR, 2019.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.