ABSTRACT
Re-municipalization is part of a broader set of reverse privatization reforms. We argue the term re-municipalization lacks conceptual clarity, confusing municipal level reversals from national ones, new service delivery from reversals, and mixed market positions from full public control. This conceptual confusion makes measurement of re-municipalization difficult. While more case studies are being discovered, quantitative time series studies do not show remunicipalization is increasing. Much case study based research argues remunicipalization is politically transformative, but quantitative research generally finds re-municipalization to be part of a pragmatic market management process, a position confirmed by the papers in this special issue.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support from the Department of Accounting of School of Business and Economics for organizing a workshop ‘Remunipalisation of municipal services in Europe and the US: a trendor a hype? This workshop took place on 14 January 2019 at theVrije Universiteit Amsterdam and several papers in this special issue were presented there.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes
1. Corporate Europe Observatory’s “water re-municipalisation tracker” is at http://www.remunicipalisation.org/front/page/remunicipalisation_wave.