584
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Existence of Integrated Regulation and Its Implication on Foreign Language Teaching: A Survey Study

ORCID Icon
Pages 67-82 | Received 11 Feb 2018, Accepted 08 Jun 2018, Published online: 20 Jun 2018
 

ABSTRACT

This study employed a large-scale cross-sectional survey (n = 443) to develop and validate second language (L2) regulatory styles [Noels et al. 2000. “Why are You Learning a Second Language? Motivational Orientations and Self-Determination Theory.” Language Learning 50 (1): 57–85] in the sample of successful English learners in an English as a second language context. Confirmatory factor analysis was used in this study to test five different models and the preferred model identified as many as six factors of regulatory style (i.e. intrinsic knowledge, intrinsic accomplishment, integrated regulation, identified regulation, introjected regulation and external regulation) in that context. Integrated regulation was the most endorsed factor among all regulatory styles, and it had a medium correlation with identified regulation. Different from Noels and her colleagues’ proposition [Noels, Clément, and Pelletier 2001. “Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Integrative Orientations of French Canadian Learners of English.” Canadian Modern Language Review 57 (3): 424–442] that it was hard to differentiate integrated regulation from identified regulation, the findings of this study suggest otherwise, and L2 regulatory styles would do well to extend its scope to allow for integrated regulation as a separate entity. Thus, foreign language teachers are expected to help students internalise the behaviour of this foreign language learning into their own goals or needs. That behaviour contributes to an individual's psychological well-being [Ryan and Deci 2000. “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-being.” American Psychologist 55: 68–78] and then contribute to an ideal L2 self. Introjected regulation was rejected, signifying that successful L2 learners need more autonomous motivation to be high achievers. Therefore, it is suggested that the specifics of a language proficiency group and different learning contexts as well should be taken into account in the future study on language learners’ motivations.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes on contributor

Jing Yu got PhD degree from the University of Auckland and an Associate Professor at one of universities in China. She published one paper in System in 2018 and submitted several manuscripts in 2018. She is a co-chief editor of two books on Extensive English Reading as well as the investigator of eight research projects. She has published nine journal articles in Chinese and attended four conferences related to English learners’ motivations and selves among the undergraduate and postgraduate students. She is familiar with mixed methods, particularly the semi-structured interview and survey. Her current research interest involves the changes in L2 possible selves across different learning contexts.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.