153
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

An examination of speechreading and spelling accuracy with high school students who are deaf or hard of hearing

, &
 

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated that spelling presents unique challenges for children who are deaf or hard of hearing (d/hh) and most do not develop age appropriate spelling skills. For these children, information about the sound structure of a word is reduced due to limited auditory input. However, children who are d/hh do have access to visual information about the sounds in words through speechreading. The objective of this study was to explore the degree to which speechreading cues are used to support spelling during a single word spelling test. Fourteen high school students who are d/hh from a state school for the Deaf, participated in two spelling conditions; Condition A in which visual information from speechreading was available and Condition B in which it was not. Spelling errors were coded by Condition for overall accuracy and accuracy based upon the visibility of the initial sound and the ambiguity of the American Sign Language (ASL) sign or picture. A multi-linguistic coding system was also used to assess each child's understanding of the phonological, morphological, orthographic, semantic, and visual imagery rules that apply to written words. Results show that total scores in both Conditions were low although spelling accuracy for the words with ambiguous signs and pictures improved when visual information from speechreading was available. The visibility of the initial speech sound did not affect test scores. The multi-linguistic analysis showed that the participants produced more semantic, morphological, and phonological errors than other errors types. The results from this study suggest that, at least with this group of participants, there is a need for greater emphasis on teaching the linguistic foundations that guide spelling, coupled with an emphasis on using the visual speech signal to obtain linguistic information.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the members of the Language and Literacy Lab, especially Rachel Shelton and Paige Tatge, for their assistance with data collection and analysis. We are particularly appreciative of the time and effort provided by students involved in this study. The second author would like to thank the University of Canterbury Erskine Fellowship Programme and the College of Education, Health and Human Development, School of Health Sciences for financial support during the preparation of this manuscript.

Disclaimer statements

Contributors All three authors contributed to the data collection, data analysis, and writing of the submitted manuscript.

Funding The authors did not receive any funding for the present study.

Conflict of interest There are no conflicts of interest, either financial or non-financial, for either Jillian McCarthy or Ilsa Schwarz. Lindsay Cannon is employed by the Tennessee School for the Deaf, where this datum was collected.

Ethics approval The University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional Review Board reviewed and consented approval of the study (IRB #: 15-03816-XP).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.