1,244
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Is two too early? Assessing toddlers’ phonology

, , , , &
 

Abstract

Early identification of phonological disorders is important for Speech Language Pathologists who assess and treat children aged under three years. Normative data justifies identification and standard scores can evaluate intervention that might prevent the negative consequences associated with phonological disorder. Two studies evaluated the reliability and predictive validity of the Toddler Phonology Test (TPT). Study 1 assessed 18 Australian toddlers, comparing their performance with normative data and reassessing them one month later to examine test–retest reliability. Study 2 assessed the predictive validity of the TPT’s quantitative and qualitative normative data by reassessing 24 British children between four and nine months after their first assessment and examining number and type of errors. Study 1 found no significant difference between the first and second assessment one month later for percent consonants and vowels correct but a drop in the number of atypical errors. Positive correlations for all performance measures showed strong test–retest ranking for children. Study 2 indicated that both quantitative and qualitative TPT data predicted phonological development over 4–9 months. Case data suggested that phonological disorder was best predicted by qualitative data. The results indicated that phonological disorder can be reliably diagnosed at two years of age.

Disclaimer statements

Contributors Mary Claessen, Suze Leitao, Anne Whitworth, and Barbara Dodd were University research staff involved in designing, supervising data collection, data analyses, as well as writing the article. Tess Beattie and Rhian Roberts were research students who collected data and collaborated on data analyses and writing the article.

Funding None.

Conflict of interest Barbara Dodd is an author of the Toddler Phonology Test.

Ethics approval Ethical clearance was obtained from University Ethics Committees (Curtin University and City University London).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.