1,210
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Report

Online study of health professionals about their vaccination attitudes and behavior in the COVID-19 era: addressing participation bias

, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 2934-2939 | Received 02 Mar 2021, Accepted 19 Apr 2021, Published online: 28 May 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Online surveys of health professionals have become increasingly popular during the COVID-19 crisis because of their ease, speed of implementation, and low cost. This article leverages an online survey of general practitioners’ (GPs’) attitudes toward the soon-to-be-available COVID-19 vaccines, implemented in October–November 2020 (before the COVID-19 vaccines were authorized in France), to study the evolution of the distribution of their demographic and professional characteristics and opinions about these vaccines, as the survey fieldwork progressed, as reminders were sent out to encourage them to participate. Focusing on the analysis of the potential determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, we also tested if factors related to survey participation biased the association estimates. Our results show that online surveys of health professionals may be subject to significant selection bias that can have a significant impact on estimates of the prevalence of some of these professionals’ behavioral, opinion, or attitude variables. Our results also highlight the effectiveness of reminder strategies in reaching hard-to-reach professionals and reducing these biases. Finally, they indicate that weighting for nonparticipation remains indispensable and that methods exist for testing (and correcting) selection biases.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the participants of this survey, Jo Ann Cahn for supervising our English, and Maxime Bergeat for his invaluable advice.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

None to declare.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website at https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1921523

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Direction de la Recherche, des Etudes, de l’Evaluation et des Statistiques (DREES)/Ministère des solidarités et de la santé (grant 2102173353) and from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) in the frame of the call for projects 2020 “Recherche-Action Covid-19”. [2102173353]

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.