1,210
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Report

Online study of health professionals about their vaccination attitudes and behavior in the COVID-19 era: addressing participation bias

, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 2934-2939 | Received 02 Mar 2021, Accepted 19 Apr 2021, Published online: 28 May 2021

References

  • Lin C, Tu P, Beitsch LM. Confidence and receptivity for COVID-19 vaccines: a rapid systematic review. Vaccines (Basel). 2020;9(1):16. doi:10.3390/vaccines9010016.
  • Cho YI, Johnson TP, Vangeest JB. Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: a meta-analysis of techniques to improve response. Eval Health Prof. 2013;36(3):382–407. doi:10.1177/0163278713496425.
  • Verger P, Fressard L, Collange F, Gautier A, Jestin C, Launay O, Raude J, Pulcini C, Peretti-Watel P. Vaccine hesitancy among general practitioners and its determinants during controversies: a national cross-sectional survey in France. EBioMedicine. 2015;2(8):891–97. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.06.018.
  • Verger P, Scronias D, Dauby N, Adedzi KA, Gobert C, Bergeat M, Gagneur A, Dubé E. Attitudes of healthcare workers towards COVID-19 vaccination: a survey in France and French-speaking parts of Belgium and Canada, 2020. Eurosurveillance. 2021;26(3):2002047. doi:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.3.2002047.
  • Verger P, Dubé E. Restoring confidence in vaccines in the COVID-19 era. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2020;19(11):991–93. doi:10.1080/14760584.2020.1825945.
  • Tillé Y. Sampling algorithms. New York: Springer New York; 2006.
  • Greene WH. Econometric analysis. 8th. London (United Kingdom): Pearson; 2018.
  • Heckman JJ. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica. 1979;47(1):153–61. doi:10.2307/1912352.
  • David Roodman CMP: Stata module to implement conditional (recursive) mixed process estimator [internet]. Boston (MA): Boston College Department of Economics; 2007. [accessed 2021 Mar 1] https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s456882.html
  • Poncet L, Rigal L, Panjo H, Gautier A, Chauvin P, Menvielle G, Cadot E, Ringa V. Disengagement of general practitioners in cervical cancer screening. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2016;25(6):547–55. doi:10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000208.
  • Clerc I, Ventelou B, Guerville M-A, Paraponaris A, Verger P. General practitioners and clinical practice guidelines: a reexamination. Med Care Res Rev. 2011;68(4):504–18. doi:10.1177/1077558710397761.
  • Silhol J, Ventelou B, Zaytseva A. How French general practitioners respond to declining medical density: a study on prescription practices, with an insight into opioids use. Eur J Health Econ. 2020;21(9):1391–98. doi:10.1007/s10198-020-01222-8.
  • Gagneux-Brunon A, Detoc M, Bruel S, Tardy B, Rozaire O, Frappe P, Botelho-Nevers E. Intention to get vaccinations against COVID-19 in French healthcare workers during the first pandemic wave: a cross sectional survey. J Hosp Infect. 2021;108:168–73. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2020.11.020.
  • Wang K, Wong ELY, Ho KF, Cheung AWL, Chan EYY, Yeoh EK, Wong SYS. Intention of nurses to accept coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination and change of intention to accept seasonal influenza vaccination during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey. Vaccine. 2020;38(45):7049–56. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.09.021.
  • Collange F, Zaytseva A, Pulcini C, Bocquier A, Verger P. Unexplained variations in general practitioners’ perceptions and practices regarding vaccination in France. Eur J Public Health. 2019;29(1):2–8. doi:10.1093/eurpub/cky146.
  • Schwarzinger M, Verger P, Guerville M-A, Aubry C, Rolland S, Obadia Y, Moatti J-P. Positive attitudes of French general practitioners towards A/H1N1 influenza-pandemic vaccination: a missed opportunity to increase vaccination uptakes in the general public? Vaccine. 2010;28(15):2743–48. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.01.027.
  • Verger P, Collange F, Fressard L, Bocquier A, Gautier A, Pulcini C, Raude J, Peretti-Watel P. Prevalence and correlates of vaccine hesitancy among general practitioners: a cross-sectional telephone survey in France, April to July 2014. Euro Surveill. 2016;21(47):30606. doi:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.47.30406.
  • Verger P, Scronias D, Monziols M, Chaput H, Ventelou B. Perceptions et opinions des médecins généralistes lors du déconfinement. Paris (France): DREES; 2020. Études & Résultats No.: 1161.
  • Legleye S, Razafindranovona T, De Peretti G Agréger les échantillons d’une enquête multimode en limitant l’effet de mesure : une proposition d’imputation raisonnable et pragmatique [internet]. Paris (France): INSEE; 2018. [accessed 2021 Mar 1] http://www.jms-insee.fr/2018/S22_2_ACTE_LEGLEYE_JMS2018.pdf.
  • Vannieuwenhuyze J, Loosveldt G, Molenberghs GA. Method for evaluating mode effects in mixed-mode surveys. Public Opin Q. 2010;74(5):1027–45. doi:10.1093/poq/nfq059.
  • Direction de la recherche, des études, de l’évaluation et des statistiques. Le panel d’observation des pratiques et des conditions d’exercice en médecine générale [Internet]. Paris (France): DREES; 2021 [accessed 2021 Mar 1]. https://drees.solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/sources-outils-et-enquetes/00-le-panel-dobservation-des-pratiques-et-des-conditions-dexercice-en
  • Galimard J-E, Chevret S, Curis E, Resche-Rigon M. Heckman imputation models for binary or continuous MNAR outcomes and MAR predictors. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18:90. doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0547-1.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.