1,077
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

UK farmers’ transition pathways towards agroecological farm redesign: evaluating explanatory models

, &
 

ABSTRACT

Although the organic conversion process has been much studied, farm-level transitions to agroecosystems are less well understood. What transition pathways do they take? How can (or does) farmers’ learning help to make such changes? What support measures can (or do) facilitate such learning? To answer such questions, a UK study identified farmers undergoing an agroecological transition and compared their practices with two prevalent models. As regards the Efficiency – Substitution – Redesign (ESR) model, our case-study farms had all three changes, but they were rarely sequential; agroecosystem redesign did not follow from Efficiency or Substitution measures, which readily provide endpoints rather than transitional stages. As regards the ‘trigger events’ model – Trigger, Active Assessment and Implementation – the three stages were often overlapping; triggers arose only when farmers’ interpreted difficulties or opportunities as grounds to implement changes, which they had generally considered beforehand. More fundamentally, case-study farmers were unlearning conventional expectations by undergoing cognitive and affective shifts. Together those two models (ESR and trigger events) can provide heuristic devices for identifying farmers’ agroecological trajectories in their diverse forms. Going further, better models of farmers’ learning and action will be necessary for facilitating agroecological transitions and guiding relevant support measures.

Acknowledgments

This paper is based on the report Transitions to Agroecological Systems: Farmers’ Viewpoints (Padel et al. Citation2018). For the research thanks to Oliver Rubinstein and Nicolas Lampkin from the Organic Research Centre and Amelia Woolford, Jim Egan, Alastair Leake from the Allerton Project of GWCT. We also acknowledge the support of all the case-study farmers for sharing their insights, financial support from the Land Use Policy Group/Scottish National Heritage, constructive feedback of the Steering Group and the organisations that helped identify suitable farms.

Notes

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Scottish National Heritage;

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.