UK farmers’ transition pathways towards agroecological farm redesign: evaluating explanatory models

References

• Altieri, M., and P. Rosset. 1996. Agroecology and the conversion of large-scale conventional systems to sustainable management. International Journal of Environmental Studies 50 (3–4):165–85. doi:10.1080/00207239608711055.
   Google Scholar
• Altieri, M. A. 1999. The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 74 (1):19–31. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00028-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APPGA. 2014. Agroecology: What it is and why we need it. London: All Party Parliamentary Group on Agroecology. https://agroecology-appg.wp-content/uploads/2014/04/AgroEco-A5-Leaflet-v4.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bellon, S., and C. Lamine. 2009. Conversion to organic farming: A multidimensional research object at the crossroads of agricultural and social sciences - A review. In Sustainable agriculture, ed. E. Lichtfouse, et al., 653–72. Dodrecht: Springer Science and Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_40.
   Google Scholar
• Berkhout, F., A. Smith, and A. Stirling. 2004. Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts. In System innovation and the transition to sustainability: theory, evidence and policy, ed. B. Elzen, F. W. Geels, and K. Green, 48–75. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bredart, D., and P. Stassart. 2017. When farmers learn through dialog with their practices: A proposal for a theory of action for agricultural trajectories. Journal of Rural Studies 53:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chantre, E., and A. Cardona. 2014. Trajectories of French field crop farmers moving toward sustainable farming practices: Change, learning, and links with the advisory services. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 38:573–602. doi:10.1080/21683565.2013.876483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, N., and J. Kirwan. 2014. The role of tacit knowledge in developing networks for sustainable agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis 54:341–61. doi:10.1111/soru.12048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darnhofer, I. 2014. Resilience and why it matters for farm management. European Review of Agricultural Economics 41 (3):461–84. doi:10.1093/erae/jbu012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diesel, V., and M. M. Dias. 2016. The Brazilian experience with agroecological extension: A critical analysis of reform in a pluralistic extension system. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 22:415–33. doi:10.1080/1389224X.2016.1227058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupré, M., T. Michels, and P.-Y. Le Gal. 2017. Diverse dynamics in agroecological transitions on fruit tree farms. European Journal of Agronomy 90:23–33. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2017.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EIP-A. 2013. European innovation partnership, agricultural productivity and sustainability (EIP-A). Strategic Implementation Plan. Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/eip/pdf/strategic-implementation-plan_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Farmar-Bowers, Q., and R. Lane. 2009. Understanding farmers’ strategic decision-making processes and the implications for biodiversity conservation policy. Journal of Environmental Management 90 (2):1135–44. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.05.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gliessman, S. R. 1997. Agroecology: The Ecology of Sustainable Food Systems, 2007. 2nd ed. New York, NY: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gliessman, S. R. 2007. Agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food systems. 2nd ed. New York, NY: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gliessman, S. R. 2016. Transforming food systems with agroecology. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 40:187–90. doi:10.1080/21683565.2015.1130765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gliessman, S. R. 2017. Agroecology and participatory knowledge production and exchange as a basis for food system change: The case of the community agroecology network. In Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture: Principles, applications, and making the transition, ed. A. Wezel, 201–228. London: Imperial College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gliessman, S. R., and M. Rosemeyer. 2010. The Conversion to Sustainable Agriculture: Principles, Processes and Practices. New York: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. 2014. Farmer attitudes & behaviour: A scoping report to examine social science evidence requirements for the new countryside stewardship scheme natural England. Unpublished report for Natural England.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, S. 1985. Redesigning the food system for sustainability. Alternatives 12:32–36.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, S. 2014. Considerations for enabling the ecological redesign of organic and conventional agriculture: A social ecology and psychosocial perspective Chapter 22. In Organic farming, prototype for sustainable agricultures. ed. S. Bellon and S. Penvern, 401–22. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, S., and R. J. MacRae. 1996. Conceptual framework for the transition from conventional to sustainable agriculture. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 7 (1):81–87. doi:10.1300/J064v07n01_07.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, E., K. Balázs, J. P. Choisis, N. Choisis, T. Gomiero, E. Kovács, G. Nguyen, M. G. Paoletti, L. Podmaniczky, J. Ryschawy, et al. 2011. Competing perceptions on biodiversity and its benefits: Theoretical and methodological implications of a focus group study. Paper prepared for the 9th International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics, Istanbul. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.06.005.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, E., Nguyen, G., Gomiero, T., Kovács, E., Choisis, J.P., Choisis, N., Paoletti, M.G., Podmaniczky, L., Ryschawy, J., Sarthou, J.P. and Herzog, F. 2013. Farmers’ perceptions of biodiversity: Lessons from a discourse-based deliberative valuation study. Land Use Policy 35:318–28. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamine, C. 2011. Transition pathways towards a robust ecologization of agriculture and the need for system redesign: Cases from organic farming and IPM. Journal of Rural Studies 27:209–19. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamine, C., and S. Bellon. 2009. Conversion to organic farming: A multidimensional research object at the crossroads of agricultural and social sciences: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29 (1):97–112. doi:10.1051/agro:2008007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampkin, N. H., B. D. Pearce, A. R. Leake, H. Creissen, C. L. Gerrard, R. Girling, S. Lloyd, S. Padel, J. Smith, L. G. Smith, et al. 2015. The role of agroecology in sustainable intensification. A Report for the Land Use Policy Group. Organic Research Centre, Elm Farm and Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust, Newbury and Fordingbride. https://www.nature.scot/role-agroecology-sustainable-intensification-lupg-report
   Google Scholar
• Macrae, R. J., S. B. Hill, G. R. Mehuys, and J. Henning. 1990. Farm-scale agronomic and economic conversion from conventional to sustainable agriculture. Advances in Agronomy 43:155–98. doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60478-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Torres, M. E., and P. Rosset. 2014. Diálogo de saberes in La Vía Campesina: Food sovereignty and agroecology. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6):979–97. doi:10.1080/03066150.2013.872632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, J., P. Gaskell, J. Ingram, J. Dwyer, M. Reed, and C. Short. 2017. Engaging farmers in environmental management through a better understanding of behaviour. Agriculture and Human Values 34 (2):283–99. doi:10.1007/s10460-016-9705-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture. 2012. The agroecology project in France, http://agriculture.gouv.fr/sites/minagri/files/1604-aec-aeenfrance-dep-gb-bd1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moschitz, H., T. Tisenkopfs, G. Brunori, R. Home, I. Kunda, and S. Sumane 2014. Agricultural knowledge systems in transition: Towards a more effective and efficient support of learning and innovation networks for sustainable agriculture. Final report of the Solinsa project. FIBL, Frick. http://orgprints.25520/
   Google Scholar
• Mottershead, D., and A. Maréchal 2017. Promotion of agroecological approaches: Lessons from other countries. A Report for the Land Use Policy Group. London: IEEP.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, C., M. Altieri, and L. Vazquez. 2016. Agroecology: Principles for the conversion and redesign of farming systems. Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography S5:010. doi:10.4172/2157-7625.S5-010.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, D. 2005. Ecological literacy. In Sustainable agriculture, ed. J. N. Pretty, 21–29. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Padel, S. 2001. Conversion to organic farming: A typical example of the diffusion of an innovation? Sociologia Ruralis 41 (1):40–60. doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padel, S. 2002. Conversion to organic milk production: The change process and farmers information needs. PhD, University of Wales. http://orgprints.3977/
   Google Scholar
• Padel, S., O. Rubinstein, A. Woolford, J. Egan, A. Leake, L. Levidow, B. Pearce, and N. Lampkin, 2018. Transitions to agroecological systems: Farmers’ viewpoints. A Report for the Land Use Policy Group (LUPG). Organic Research Centre and Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust, Newbury and Fordingbridge. https://www.nature.scot/transitions-agroecological-systems-farmers-experience
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, P., E. M. Mussoi, and F. D. Soglio. 2013. Institutionalization of the agroecological approach in Brazil: Dvances and challenges. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37 (1):103–14. doi:10.1080/10440046.2012.735632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretty, J. 2016. Sustainable intensification and efficiency-substitution-and-redesign, http://sirn.org.uk/2016/11/16/sustainable-intensification-efficiency-substitution-and-redesign/
   Google Scholar
• Rajasekaran, B. 1999. Indigenous agricultural experimentation in home gardens of South India: Conserving biological diversity and achieving nutritional security. In Biological and cultural diversity. The role of indigenous agricultural experimentation in development, ed. G. Prain, S. Fujisaka, and M. D. Warren, 134–46. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. 1983. Diffusion of Innovation. New York, NY: The Free Press. https://teddykw2.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/everett-m-rogers-diffusion-of-innovations.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, P., and M. Altieri. 1997. Agroecology versus input substitution: A fundamental contradiction of sustainable agriculture. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal 10 (3):283–95. doi:10.1080/08941929709381027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosset, P. M., and M. E. Martínez-Torres. 2012. Rural social movements and agroecology: Context, theory, and process. Ecology and Society 17 (3):17. doi:10.5751/ES-05000-170317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumberg, J., and C. Okali. 1997. Farmers’ experiments: Creating local knowledge. London: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, L.-A., R. J. Burton, J. Ingram, K. Blackstock, B. Slee, and N. Gotts. 2012. Triggering change: Towards a conceptualisation of major change processes in farm decision-making. Journal of Environmental Management 104:142–51. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toffolini, Q., A. Cardona, M. Casagrande, B. Dedieu, N. Girard, and E. Ollion. 2018. Agroecology as farmers’ situated ways of acting: A conceptual framework. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 1–32. doi:10.1080/21683565.2018.1514677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, GA. 2007. Multifunctional agriculture: A transition theory perspective. Wallingford: CAB International (CABI).
   Google Scholar