2,558
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Clinical characteristics and potential indicators for definite diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion

, , , , &
Pages 1924-1931 | Received 26 Feb 2019, Accepted 19 Apr 2019, Published online: 16 May 2019
 

Abstract

Aims

The study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with pleural effusion (PE), and explore the effective indicators for definite diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion (TBPE).

Methods

The adult patients with the presence of PE were enrolled. All the patients received pleural fluid Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA detection, ADA activity measure and blood T-SPOT.TB test. The clinical characteristics and examination results were recorded.

Results

A total of 77 PE patients, including 30 (38.96%) TBPE, 19 (24.67%) malignant PE, 6 (7.79%) empyema, 10 (12.99%) parapneumonic effusion and 12 (15.58%) miscellaneous causes, were enrolled. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of pleural fluid M. tuberculosis DNA detection were 33.3% and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic parameters of pleural fluid ADA for TBPE were as follows: sensitivity 50% and specificity 78.7%. In PE cases with pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) more than 500 U/L, the diagnostic values of DNA detection and ADA activity were enhanced, and DNA detection was superior to ADA activity. In addition, the ratio of blood T-STOP.TB A + B to lymphocyte was a potential diagnostic biomarker for TBPE with the sensitivity of 83.3% and the specificity of 66.0%.

Conclusion

The clinical significance of pleural fluid M. tuberculosis DNA detection is superior to ADA activity in the diagnosis of TBPE, especially in PE cases with LDH value more than 500 U/L. The ratio of blood T-STOP.TB A + B to lymphocyte is a potential indicator for definite diagnosis of TBPE, with high sensitivity.

Acknowledgements

The authors wished to thank Guoqiang Cao for their assistance in microbiological-biochemical and molecular analyses.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.