Abstract
Explore how the 5 Practices tool can be used to support productive discussion and equitable participation in online science experiences.
Supplemental Material
References
- Cartier, J.L., M.S. Smith, M.K. Stein, and D.K. Ross. 2013. 5 practices for orchestrating productive task-based discussions in science. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Lipponen, L., M. Rahikainen, J. Lallimo, and K. Hakkarainen. 2003. Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer-supported collaborative learning, Learning and Instruction 13 (5): 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00042-7.
- National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. 2010. Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Washington, DC: NGAC and CCSSO.
- NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Shepardson, D.P., and Britsch, S.J. 2006. Zones of interaction: Differential access to elementary science discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 443–466. doi: 10.1002/tea.20104
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Kristin Cook
Kristin Cook ([email protected]) is an associate professor of science education at Bellarmine University in Louisville, Kentucky;
Sahar Alameh
Sahar Alameh is an assistant professor of STEM education at University of Kentucky in Lexington, Kentucky;
Cathrine Maiorca
Cathrine Maiorca is an assistant professor of mathematics education at California State University Long Beach in Long Beach, California;
L. Octavia Tripp
L. Octavia Tripp is an associate professor at Auburn University in Auburn, Alabama;
Craig Schroeder
Craig Schroeder is a STEM curriculum coach at University of Kentucky in Lexington, Kentucky;
Margaret Mohr-Schroeder
Margaret Mohr-Schroeder is a professor of STEM education at University of Kentucky in Lexington, Kentucky.