269
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Using Multisensory Haptic Integration to Improve Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 188-206 | Received 09 May 2019, Accepted 18 May 2020, Published online: 04 Jun 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Alarm fatigue and medical alarm mismanagement reduces the quality of patient care and creates stressful work environments for clinicians. Here, the feasibility of a novel “pre-alarm” system that utilizes multisensory integration of auditory and haptic stimuli is examined as a possible solution.

Methods

Three vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, and blood oxygenation) were represented by three musically distinct sounds that were combined into soundscapes and progressed through five pre-alarm zones (very low to very high). Three haptic conditions were tested with the auditory stimulus to determine the best combination of auditory and haptic stimulation. Qualitative data was collected through surveys and the NASA TLX index.

Results

Alterations in frequency and timbre were most effective at transmitting information regarding changing vital sign zones with comparatively higher accuracy and quicker reaction time (RT), p <.01. The addition of haptic stimuli to the auditory soundscape caused no significant decline in study participant accuracy or RT. However, two weeks after training, participants performed the tasks significantly faster (p <.001) and felt the alarm monitoring task was significantly less cognitively demanding (p <.01), compared to the unisensory condition. Participants also felt more confident in identifying changing vital signs with the addition of haptic stimuli.

Discussion

The current study demonstrates that multisensory signals do not diminish the perception of transmitted information and suggest efficient training benefits over unimodal signals. Multisensory training may be beneficial over time compared to unisensory training due to a stronger consolidation effect. The potential integration of haptic input with existing auditory alarm systems and training is supported.

Acknowledgmrnts

The authors would like to acknowledge Drs. Matthew Walker III and Michael King (Vanderbilt School of Engineering) for the time and support. Additionally, the authors would like to acknowledge Drs. Matthew Weinger and Pratik Pandharipande (Vanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Anesthesiology) for the time and support.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.