This article draws on research which examines the introduction of a new supervision policy in a social services department. It specifically addresses the use of supervision as an instrument of change within a welfare organisation, which was thought by its senior management to be constrained by a 'culture of dependency'. Although evidence of such a culture was at best equivocal, the organisation was pervaded by polarised mythologies of dependency and autonomy which aligned it with wider political discourses hostile to social welfare. This contributed to the generation of heightened anxieties, distorted communication and destructive states of mind. The paper highlights some of the ways in which the supervision policy, once established, was able to help staff overcome the difficulties that its implementation had initially triggered. It illustrates the function of supervision as a container for quite severe organisational anxieties which enable it to play a vital part in avoiding the consolidation of group defences.
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.