11
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
DNA Dynamics and Chromosome Structure

Defects in Components of the Proteasome Enhance Transcriptional Silencing at Fission Yeast Centromeres and Impair Chromosome Segregation

, , , , , & show all
Pages 5155-5165 | Received 14 Dec 1998, Accepted 19 Apr 1999, Published online: 28 Mar 2023
 

Abstract

Fission yeast centromeres are transcriptionally silent and form a heterochromatin-like structure essential for normal centromere function; this appears analogous to heterochromatin and position effect variegation in other eukaryotes. Conditional mutations in three genes designated cep (centromere enhancer of position effect) were found to enhance transcriptional silencing within centromeres. Cloning of the cep1+ and cep2+ genes by functional complementation revealed that they are identical to the previously described genes pad1+ and mts2+, respectively, which both encode subunits of the proteasome 19S cap. Like Mts2 and Mts4, epitope-tagged Cep1/Pad1 localizes to or near the nuclear envelope throughout the cell cycle. The cep mutants display a range of phenotypes depending on the temperature. Silencing within the central domain of centromeres is increased at 36°C. This suggests that the proteasome is involved in regulating silencing and thus centromeric chromatin architecture, possibly by lowering the level of some chromatin-associated protein by ubiquitin-dependent degradation. This is the first report of defective proteasome function affecting heterochromatin-mediated transcriptional silencing. At 36 and 32°C, the cep mutants lose chromosomes at an elevated rate, and at 18°C, the mutants are cryosensitive for growth. Cytological analysis at 18°C revealed a defect in sister chromatid separation while other mitotic events occurred normally, indicating that cep mutations might interfere specifically with the degradation of inhibitor(s) of sister chromatid separation. These observations suggest that 19S subunits confer a level of substrate specificity on the proteasome and raise the possibility of a link between components involved in centromere architecture and sister chromatid cohesion.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank A. Carr and C. Norbury for providing S. pombe libraries, K. Gull for the gift of TAT1 monoclonal antibody, and M. Yanagida for the gift of FISH probes and the Ch16 minichromosome. Thanks go to P. Perry, N. Davidson for the photographic work, and A. Pidoux for useful comments on the manuscript.

J.-P.J. was supported by a Travelling Fellowship from The Wellcome Trust and an EC Human Capital and Mobility Award to R.A. Core support for this work was provided by the Medical Research Council of Great Britain to R.A. Work in Bordeaux, France, was supported by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. P.B. was supported by a grant from the Ministère de la Recherche et de l’Enseignement Supérieur.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.