24
Views
77
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Cell Growth and Development

Inactivation of the Mgat1 Gene in Oocytes Impairs Oogenesis, but Embryos Lacking Complex and Hybrid N-Glycans Develop and Implant

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 9920-9929 | Received 10 Jun 2004, Accepted 24 Aug 2004, Published online: 27 Mar 2023
 

Abstract

Complex and hybrid N-glycans contain sugar residues that have been implicated in fertilization, compaction of the embryo, and implantation. Inactivation of the Mgat1 gene responsible for their synthesis is embryonic lethal, but homozygous mutant blastocysts are phenotypically normal due to the presence of maternal Mgat1 gene transcripts. To identify roles for complex and hybrid N-glycans in oogenesis and preimplantation development, the Mgat1 gene in oocytes was deleted by using a ZP3Cre recombinase transgene. All mutant oocytes had an altered zona pellucida (ZP) that was thinner than the control ZP, and they did not possess complex N-glycans but contained ZP1, ZP2, and ZP3 glycoproteins. Mutant eggs were fertilized, all embryos implanted, and heterozygotes developed to birth. However, mutant females had decreased fertility, yielded fewer eggs after stimulation with gonadotropins, and produced a reduced number of preimplantation embryos and less progeny than controls. About 25% of embryonic day 3.5 (E3.5) embryos derived from mutant eggs were severely retarded in development, even when they were heterozygous and expressed complex N-glycans. Thus, a proportion of Mgat1 / oocytes were developmentally compromised. Surprisingly, mutant eggs also gave rise to Mgat1 / embryos that developed normally, implanted, and progressed to E9.5. Therefore, complex or hybrid N-glycans are required at some stage of oogenesis for the generation of a developmentally competent oocyte, but fertilization, blastogenesis, and implantation may proceed in their absence.

View correction statement:
Inactivation of the Mgat1 Gene in Oocytes Impairs Oogenesis, but Embryos Lacking Complex and Hybrid N-Glycans Develop and Implant

We thank Paula Cohen for critical comments on the manuscript and technical advice and Frank Macaluso for sectioning and microscopy.

This work was supported by grants RO1 CA 30645 to P.S. and RO1 DK 48257 to J.D.M. Partial support was provided by Albert Einstein Cancer Center grant PO1 13330.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.