109
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Understanding low COPD exacerbation rates in Japan: a review and comparison with other countries

, , , &
Pages 3459-3471 | Published online: 26 Oct 2018
 

Abstract

COPD is associated with significant morbidity and is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Periods of exacerbation, the acute worsening of symptoms, are interspersed throughout the disease’s natural history and can result in increased treatment burden and hospitalization for patients with COPD. The frequency of exacerbations varies between countries, with both epidemiological studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showing significant differences in observed prevalence rates. Differences in study design and the healthcare setting are likely to contribute to differences in exacerbation frequency, however the perceived rate of exacerbations in Japan is currently lower then the rest of the world. This review identified nine cohort studies and five RCTs that reported COPD annual exacerbation rates in Japan in the ranges of 0.1–2.1 and 0.33–1.79, respectively. The difference in exacerbation rate between studies appeared greater than the difference between Japan and Western countries, likely because of disparities between settings, design, and inclusion criteria. Of these, only one (Understanding the Long-Term Impacts of Tiotropium) had uniform inclusion criteria across different regions. This study found that the annual rate of exacerbation events per patient in Japan was 0.61, compared with 0.85 worldwide in the placebo groups. This review summarizes the published rates of COPD exacerbations in Japan and the rest of the world and explores the hypotheses as to why rates in Japan might be lower than other countries. These include access to medical care, variance in the associated morbidity profile, environmental factors, diagnostic crossover with related diseases, and differences in study design (including the underreporting of COPD exacerbations in Japan). Understanding the reasons why COPD exacerbation rates appear lower in Japan could help clinicians to recognize and modify treatment behaviors, which may lead to improved patient outcomes in all populations.

Supplementary materials

Table S1 Summary of key study design information from cohort studies detailing COPD exacerbation rates in JapanCitation1Citation9

Table S2 Summary of key study design information from RCTs detailing COPD exacerbation rates in JapanCitation10Citation14

References

  • TakahashiTMuroSTanabeNRelationship between periodontitis-related antibody and frequent exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasePLoS One201277e4057022792372
  • MotegiTJonesRCIshiiTA comparison of three multidimensional indices of COPD severity as predictors of future exacerbationsInt J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis2013825927123754870
  • TakemuraMMitsuiKIdoMEffect of a network system for providing proper inhalation technique by community pharmacists on clinical outcomes in COPD patientsInt J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis2013823924423696699
  • SuzukiMMakitaHItoYMClinical features and determinants of COPD exacerbation in the Hokkaido COPD cohort studyEur Respir J20144351289129724232696
  • KurashimaKTakakuYHoshiTLobe-based computed tomography assessment of airway diameter, airway or vessel number, and emphysema extent in relation to the clinical outcomes of COPDInt J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis2015101027103326082626
  • MatsunagaKHayataAAkamatsuKStratifying the risk of COPD exacerbation using the modified Medical Research Council scale: a multicenter cross-sectional CAP studyRespir Investig20155328285
  • NatoriHKawayamaTSuetomoMEvaluation of the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale for predicting hospitalization and exacerbation in Japanese patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseIntern Med2016551152426726080
  • SatoMChubachiSSasakiMImpact of mild exacerbation on COPD symptoms in a Japanese cohortInt J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis2016111269127827354785
  • TakayanagiSKawataNTadaYLongitudinal changes in structural abnormalities using MDCT in COPD: do the CT measurements of airway wall thickness and small pulmonary vessels change in parallel with emphysematous progression?Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis20171255156028243075
  • FurumotoAOhkusaYChenMAdditive effect of pneumococcal vaccine and influenza vaccine on acute exacerbation in patients with chronic lung diseaseVaccine200826334284428918585831
  • SasakiTNakayamaKYasudaHA randomized, single-blind study of lansoprazole for the prevention of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in older patientsJ Am Geriatr Soc20095781453145719515110
  • FukuchiYFernandezLKuoHPEfficacy of tiotropium in COPD patients from Asia: a subgroup analysis from the UPLIFT trialRespirology201116582583521539680
  • FukuchiYTatsumiKInoueHPrevention of COPD exacerbation by lysozyme: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studyInt J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis20161183183827143873
  • JonesPKatoMFujimotoKLATE-BREAKING ABSTRACT: large differences in rate of reported and unreported COPD exacerbations in Japanese patientsEur Respir J201648A635

Acknowledgments

Editorial support (in the form of literature searches, writing assistance during development of the first and subsequent drafts, assembling tables and figures, collating authors comments, grammatical editing, and referencing) was provided by Elizabeth Hutchinson, PhD, CMPP, of Fishawack Indicia Ltd, UK, funded by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). Editorial support costs associated with preparation of this paper were funded by GSK.

Author contributions

All the authors were involved in reviewing and developing the drafts for publication and approved the final version to be submitted. TI, MN, and PJ contributed equally to the manuscript development. All authors contributed toward data analysis, drafting and revising the paper and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

TI, AA, MJ, and PJ are employees of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and hold stock/shares in GSK. MN has received research grants from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and Novartis Japan, as well as personal fees from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.