![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
Background. We compared target and normal tissue dosimetric indices between ultra-hypofractionated passively scattered proton radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer.
Material and methods. Ten patients were treated definitively for localized prostate cancer with SBRT to a dose of 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions prescribed to a volume encompassing the prostate only. Dose-volume constraints were applied to the rectum, bladder, penile bulb, femoral heads, and prostatic and membranous urethra. Three-field passively scattered proton plans were retrospectively generated using target volumes from the same patients. Dosimetric indices were compared between the SBRT and proton plans using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.
Results. All dose constraints were achieved using both ultra-hypofractionated passively scattered proton and SBRT planning. Proton plans demonstrated significant improvement over SBRT in mean dose delivered to the penile bulb (5.2 CGE vs. 11.4 Gy; p = 0.002), rectum (6.7 CGE vs. 10.6 Gy; p = 0.002), and membranous urethra (32.2 CGE vs. 34.4 Gy; p = 0.006) with improved target homogeneity resulting in a significant reduction in hot spots and volumes of tissue exposed to low doses of radiation. Compared to proton planning, SBRT planning resulted in significant improvement in target conformality with a mean index of 1.17 versus 1.72 (p = 0.002), resulting in a dose reduction to the volume of bladder receiving more than 90% of the PD (V32.6, 7.5% vs. 15.9%; p = 0.01) and mean dose to the left (7.1 Gy vs. 10.4 CGE; p = 0.004) and right (4.0 Gy vs. 10.9 CGE; p = 0.01) femoral heads.
Conclusion. Target and normal tissue dose constraints for ultra-hypofractionated definitive radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer are readily achieved using both CK SBRT and passively scattered proton-based therapy suggesting feasibility of either modality.
Declaration of interest: The following authors report no conflicts of interest: T.P. Kole, R.C. Nichols, S. Lei, B. Wu, S.N. Huh, C. Morris, S. Lee, N. Mendenhall and A. Dritschilo. S.P. Collins is an Accuray clinical consultant. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
Supplementary material available online
Supplementary Appendix, Tables I and II, available online at http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/0284186X.2014.953260