![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is continuously gaining ground in cancer treatment. However, there is currently no planning system associated with these devices, which precludes patient-specific dose delivery optimization. The objective of this study was the development and validation of a Monte Carlo simulation (MCS)-based dosimetry platform using the Intrabeam™ system.
Methods. After surgical resection of the tumor this system delivers a single dose fraction at the surface of an applicator irradiating the tumor bed through a 50 kV x-ray beam. The GATE MCS platform was used in this study combining the phase space obtained by modeling the x-ray source and the detailed modeling of the additional parts of the Intrabeam™ system. The model was validated by comparing simulated versus experimental measurements of depth dose curves (DDC) and isotropy. A clinical validation study was also carried out using patient computed tomography images.
Results. The mean deviation between measured and simulated DDC was 2.9% ± 4.4% and 5.9% ± 5.7% for the bare needle and the use of applicators, respectively. A good agreement with experimental measurements was also found in terms of dose isotropy with a maximum difference of 2.04% for the 40 mm diameter applicator. A patient study revealed a mean absolute deviation of 0.06 Gy between simulated and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) measured skin doses.
Conclusion. This study shows the potential of using the GATE MCS platform to model three-dimensional dose distributions of the Intrabeam™ system for use in IORT.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Carl Zeiss Surgical Group, for helpful information on the applicators’ characteristics used in the Intrabeam™ system. This work was funded by a grant (DOSEVAL) from the National Institute of Cancer (INCa) in France. The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
Supplementary material available online
Supplementary Figure 1-2, Supplementary Table I to be found online at http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/0284186X.2015.1016623.