Abstract
Each time a practitioner creates or modifies an augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) display for a client, that practitioner must make a series of decisions about which vocabulary concepts to include, as well as physical and organizational features of the display. Yet, little is known about what factors influence the actual decisions and their outcomes. This research examined the design factors identified as priorities by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) when creating AAC displays for young children (age 10 years and under), and their rationale for the selection of these priorities. An online survey gathered ratings and comments from 112 SLPs with experience in AAC concerning the importance of a variety of factors related to designing an aided AAC display. Results indicated that some decisions were supported by existing research evidence, such as choosing vocabulary, collaborating with key stakeholders, and supporting partner modeling. Other decisions highlight areas for future research, including use of visual scene display layouts, symbol background color, and supports for motor planning.
Acknowledgements
This research was conducted in partial fulfillment of the first author's doctoral training.
The authors would like to thank student researchers Lauren Cherry, Marni Gruber, Samantha McDonald, and Paige McManus for their assistance on this project.
Funding
The first author received funding from the U.S. Department of Education, doctoral training grant [#H325D110008].
Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
Supplementary material available online
Supplementary Appendix A and B to be found online at http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/07434618.2015.1035798
Notes
1. Qualtrics and all other Qualtrics product or service names are registered trademarks or trademarks of Qualtrics, Provo, UT, USA. http://www.qualtrics.com
2. The complete survey included five sections; the broad design questions were asked within Sections 1 and 2; the demographics questions were asked within Section 5. The case study specific questions asked in Sections 3 and 4 will be reported in another paper.