1,003
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Glucuronoxylomannan, galactoxylomannan, and mannoprotein occupy spatially separate and discrete regions in the capsule of Cryptococcus neoformans

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 500-508 | Received 14 Jul 2010, Accepted 27 Aug 2010, Published online: 01 Nov 2010
 

Abstract

The capsular polysaccharides of Cryptococcus neoformans have historically been divided into three components namely, glucuronoxylomannan (GXM), galactoxylomannan (GalXM), and mannoprotein (MP) but their relative spatial-geographical relationship in the capsule is unknown.  To explore this problem would require the capacity for visualizing these components in the capsule.  Prior studies have reported serological reagents to GXM and GalXM but no antibodies are available against MPs.  Consequently, we immunized Balb/c mice with C. neoformans recombinant mannoprotein 98 and recovered twelve monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) of which one, an IgG2a designated 18F2, bound to intact cells by immunofluorescence. mAb 18F2 bound to the cell wall surface in acapsular and encapsulated cells.  Using mAb 18F2 and previously generated antibodies to GXM and GalXM we have established the localization of three capsular components GXM, GalXM and one type of mannoprotein, MP98 on the C. neoformans cell.  The results show that MP98, like GalXM, is found near the cell wall and this information allows us to begin to discern the geography of the cryptococcal capsule.

Acknowledgements

We thank Susan Buhl for sharing her expertise during the generation of the hybridoma cell lines. We also thank Stuart Chaskes for his technical help in culturing different C. neoformans strains. The data in this paper are from a thesis submitted by Magdia De Jesus in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Sue Golding Graduate Division of Medical Science, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY.

Financial Disclosure

This work was supported by NIH grants AI33774, AI33142 and HL59842-01 to A.C. and AI025780 and AI066087 to S.M.L. M.D. was supported by NCI/NIH training grant 2T32CA009173-31.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1 Construction of MP98(CDA2) deletion in strain JEC 34 (serotype D). PC R was used to fuse the promoter region of MP98 (PMP98) and its terminator (TMP98) with the ORF of URA5 to generate a cassette for gene replacement, as shown in (A). Primers are designated in lower case (a–h) and their sequences are given in . Domains of the MP98(CDA2) protein (signal peptide, catalytic and Serine/Threonine-rich) are boxed with “Y” used to identify putative N-glycosylation sites.Citation28 As shown in (B), the strategy to confirm gene replacement for Ura+ transformants was by PC R. Genomic DNAs were used as templates with five sets of primers (g–n, ) to generate products (A–E). Shown below the maps is an electrophoretogram comparing PC R products from wild-type control DNA (1) with a JEC34 Ura+ transformant (2). Each of the five PC R products of the transformant were indicative of gene replacement and a new genotype (mp98::URA5).

Figure 1 Construction of MP98(CDA2) deletion in strain JEC 34 (serotype D). PC R was used to fuse the promoter region of MP98 (PMP98) and its terminator (TMP98) with the ORF of URA5 to generate a cassette for gene replacement, as shown in (A). Primers are designated in lower case (a–h) and their sequences are given in Table 1. Domains of the MP98(CDA2) protein (signal peptide, catalytic and Serine/Threonine-rich) are boxed with “Y” used to identify putative N-glycosylation sites.Citation28 As shown in (B), the strategy to confirm gene replacement for Ura+ transformants was by PC R. Genomic DNAs were used as templates with five sets of primers (g–n, Table 1) to generate products (A–E). Shown below the maps is an electrophoretogram comparing PC R products from wild-type control DNA (1) with a JEC34 Ura+ transformant (2). Each of the five PC R products of the transformant were indicative of gene replacement and a new genotype (mp98::URA5).

Figure 2 Strain deleted of MP98(CDA2) lacks MP98 protein. Supernatant of a cell homogenate of untransformed strain JEC34 was compared to that of the Ura+ transformant with genotype mp98(cda2)::URA5 ascribed by PCR analysis in . Unstimulated sample had no protein added. Values are the average of four measurements. This bioassay incorporated the specificity of the T-cell hybridoma P1D6 in recognizing an epitope on the MP98(CDA2) protein; recognition activates IL-2 secretion.

Figure 2 Strain deleted of MP98(CDA2) lacks MP98 protein. Supernatant of a cell homogenate of untransformed strain JEC34 was compared to that of the Ura+ transformant with genotype mp98(cda2)::URA5 ascribed by PCR analysis in Figure 1. Unstimulated sample had no protein added. Values are the average of four measurements. This bioassay incorporated the specificity of the T-cell hybridoma P1D6 in recognizing an epitope on the MP98(CDA2) protein; recognition activates IL-2 secretion.

Figure 3 mAb 18F2 is limited to strain JEC21. Immunofluorescence using anti-MP98 MAb 18F2 with serotype D and serotype A, C. neoformans strains. MP98 is located in a punctate pattern in B3501 and near the cell wall in cap67 (top parts). The cda1::URA5 mutant shows an accumulation of MP98 protein in the emerging bud. The negative control, mp98(cda2)::URA5 mutant shows only background fluorescence. Parental strains KN99a and KN99α, mutant cda2Δ and the cda1Δcda2Δcda3Δfpd1Δ quadruple mutant each display only background fluorescence (lower parts). Scale bar is 5 µm.

Figure 3 mAb 18F2 is limited to strain JEC21. Immunofluorescence using anti-MP98 MAb 18F2 with serotype D and serotype A, C. neoformans strains. MP98 is located in a punctate pattern in B3501 and near the cell wall in cap67 (top parts). The cda1::URA5 mutant shows an accumulation of MP98 protein in the emerging bud. The negative control, mp98(cda2)::URA5 mutant shows only background fluorescence. Parental strains KN99a and KN99α, mutant cda2Δ and the cda1Δcda2Δcda3Δfpd1Δ quadruple mutant each display only background fluorescence (lower parts). Scale bar is 5 µm.

Figure 4 Capsules from B3501 and KN99α had similar permeability to dextran. A dextran penetration assay was performed using tetramethylrhodamine-labeled dextran of molecular weights 10, 40 and 70 kDa. The penetration of dextrans into the capsule was similar for both strains.

Figure 4 Capsules from B3501 and KN99α had similar permeability to dextran. A dextran penetration assay was performed using tetramethylrhodamine-labeled dextran of molecular weights 10, 40 and 70 kDa. The penetration of dextrans into the capsule was similar for both strains.

Figure 5 Alignment of MP98 protein sequences encoded by H99, JEC 21 and WM 276 (Serotype B) C. neoformans strains. Sequence highlighted in yellow is for the MP98 protein encoded by the JEC21 allele that was expressed in E. coli and used for generating mAbs. The green areas are putative N-linked glycosylation sites. The red areas are not N-glycosylated in protein encoded by other alleles. The gray areas are possible sites of O-glycosylation differences among protein sequences.

Figure 5 Alignment of MP98 protein sequences encoded by H99, JEC 21 and WM 276 (Serotype B) C. neoformans strains. Sequence highlighted in yellow is for the MP98 protein encoded by the JEC21 allele that was expressed in E. coli and used for generating mAbs. The green areas are putative N-linked glycosylation sites. The red areas are not N-glycosylated in protein encoded by other alleles. The gray areas are possible sites of O-glycosylation differences among protein sequences.

Figure 6 Reconstruction of capsular components. 3D confocal reconstructions from Z-series stacks of B3501 and cap67 cells. Green: GalXM, red: GXM, blue: MP98. Scale bar is 5 µm.

Figure 6 Reconstruction of capsular components. 3D confocal reconstructions from Z-series stacks of B3501 and cap67 cells. Green: GalXM, red: GXM, blue: MP98. Scale bar is 5 µm.

Figure 7 Colocalization studies of MP98 and other mannoproteins using mAb 18F2 and Con A lectin respectively. C. neoformans strain B3501 parts (A–F) and MP98 mutant strain parts (G–I). Left parts are C. neoformans treated with mAb 18F2 (green), middle parts Con A (red) and right parts are the merged images. In B3501 (parts A–F) Con A stains the mannoproteins of cell wall and mannoproteins found on the capsular edge, the mAb 18F2 specifically recognizes and binds to MP98. Parts (A–C) also show that MP98 is mostly localized next to the cell wall during budding. Parts (D–F) shows that 18F2 localizes to bud scars. Parts (G–I) shows that 18F2 is specific for MP98 but that other MPs are available to bind to Con A. Scale bar is 5 µm.

Figure 7 Colocalization studies of MP98 and other mannoproteins using mAb 18F2 and Con A lectin respectively. C. neoformans strain B3501 parts (A–F) and MP98 mutant strain parts (G–I). Left parts are C. neoformans treated with mAb 18F2 (green), middle parts Con A (red) and right parts are the merged images. In B3501 (parts A–F) Con A stains the mannoproteins of cell wall and mannoproteins found on the capsular edge, the mAb 18F2 specifically recognizes and binds to MP98. Parts (A–C) also show that MP98 is mostly localized next to the cell wall during budding. Parts (D–F) shows that 18F2 localizes to bud scars. Parts (G–I) shows that 18F2 is specific for MP98 but that other MPs are available to bind to Con A. Scale bar is 5 µm.

Table 1 Primers to make MP98(CDA2) deletion cassette and confirm gene replacement

Table 1 Primers to make CDA1 deletion cassette and confirm gene replacement