222
Views
52
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Validity and objectivity: Reflections on the role and nature of Rasch models

Pages 268-298 | Published online: 11 Jul 2012

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (13)

Tine Nielsen, Ask Elklit, Maria Louison Vang, Sabrina Brødsgaard Nielsen, Mikkel Auning-Hansen & Sabina Palic. (2023) Cross-cultural validity and psychometric properties of the International Trauma Questionnaire in a clinical refugee sample. European Journal of Psychotraumatology 14:1.
Read now
Alice Ørts Hansen, Hanne Kaae Kristensen, Hans Tromborg & Tina Hansen. (2023) Evidence of internal construct validity of SOC-13 total score, for use in hand therapy. Disability and Rehabilitation 45:22, pages 3737-3747.
Read now
Karen-Inge Karstoft, Tine Nielsen & Anni B. S. Nielsen. (2021) Measuring Social Support among Soldiers with the Experienced Post-Deployment Social Support Scale (EPSSS): A Rasch-Based Construct Validity Study. Behavioral Medicine 47:2, pages 131-139.
Read now
LM Ørnbjerg, KB Christensen, A Tennant & ML Hetland. (2020) Validation and assessment of minimally clinically important difference of the unadjusted Health Assessment Questionnaire in a Danish cohort: uncovering ordinal bias. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology 49:1, pages 1-7.
Read now
Nina Madsen Sjoe, Dorthe Bleses, Line Dybdal, Eva Tideman, Henriette Kirkeby, Karen Krag Sehested, Hanne Nielsen, Svend Kreiner & Peter Jensen. (2019) Short Danish Version of the Tools for Early Assessment in Math (TEAM) for 3–6-Year-Olds. Early Education and Development 30:2, pages 238-258.
Read now
T. Nielsen, J. Dammeyer, M. L. Vang & G. Makransky. (2018) Gender Fairness in Self-Efficacy? A Rasch-Based Validity Study of the General Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (GASE). Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 62:5, pages 664-681.
Read now
Karen-Inge Karstoft, Anni B. S. Nielsen & Tine Nielsen. (2017) Assessment of depression in veterans across missions: a validity study using Rasch measurement models. European Journal of Psychotraumatology 8:1.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (39)

Tine Nielsen, Maiken Pontoppidan, Morten Pettersson, Christina H. Donstrup, Svend Kreiner & Signe Boe Rayce. (2023) Measuring child and adolescent well-being in Denmark: Validation and norming of the Danish KIDSCREEN-10 child/adolescent version in a national representative sample of school pupils in grades five through eight. PLOS ONE 18:9, pages e0291420.
Crossref
Jing Cong, Xinyuan Wu, Jing Wang, Chenli Feng, Yiting Wu, Gislin Dagnelie & Yuanzhi Yuan. (2023) Development of The Chinese Version of Ultra-Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire-150. Translational Vision Science & Technology 12:6, pages 9.
Crossref
Purya Baghaei & Karl Bang Christensen. (2023) Modeling local item dependence in C-tests with the loglinear Rasch model. Language Testing, pages 026553222311551.
Crossref
Pedro Henrique Ribeiro Santiago, Lisa Gaye Smithers, Rachel Roberts & Lisa Jamieson. (2023) Psychometric properties of the Social Support Scale (SSS) in two Aboriginal samples. PLOS ONE 18:1, pages e0279954.
Crossref
Alexandra Ganglmair‐Wooliscroft & Ben Wooliscroft. (2022) A hierarchy of sustainable grocery shopping behaviours: Using Rasch modelling to explore adoption groups. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 21:6, pages 1420-1439.
Crossref
Inmaculada Martínez-García, Tine Nielsen & Enrique Alastor. (2021) Perceived Stress and Perceived Lack of Control of Spanish Education-Degree University Students: Differences Dependent on Degree Year, Basis for Admission and Gender. Psychological Reports 125:4, pages 1824-1851.
Crossref
Donald Maciver, Vaibhav Tyagi, Lorna Johnston, Jessica M. Kramer, Janet Richmond, Liliya Todorova, Dulce Romero‐Ayuso, Hiromi Nakamura‐Thomas, Margo van Hartingsveldt, Anne O’Hare & Kirsty Forsyth. (2022) Psychometric properties of the School Participation Questionnaire: Testing a measure of participation‐related constructs. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 64:7, pages 847-854.
Crossref
Tine Nielsen, Inmaculada Martínez-García & Enrique Alastor. (2022) Exploring First Semester Changes in Domain-Specific Critical Thinking. Frontiers in Education 7.
Crossref
Lisa D. Wijsen, Denny Borsboom & Anna Alexandrova. (2021) Values in Psychometrics. Perspectives on Psychological Science 17:3, pages 788-804.
Crossref
Tine Nielsen, Inmaculada Martínez-García & Enrique Alastor. 2022. Academic Self-efficacy in Education. Academic Self-efficacy in Education 71 96 .
János Valery Gyuricza, Karl Bang Christensen, Ana Flávia Pires Lucas d’Oliveira & John Brodersen. (2021) Psychometric properties of a condition-specific PROM for the psychosocial consequences of Labelling hypertension by using Rasch analysis. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 5:1.
Crossref
Tine Nielsen. (2021) Psychometric evaluation of the Danish language version of the field practice experiences questionnaire for students in teacher education (FPE-DK) using item analysis according to the Rasch model. PLOS ONE 16:10, pages e0258459.
Crossref
Karl B. Christensen, Jonathan D. Comins, Michael R. Krogsgaard, John Brodersen, Jonas Jensen, Christian Fugl Hansen & Svend Kreiner. (2021) Psychometric validation of PROM instruments. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 31:6, pages 1225-1238.
Crossref
Jonathan D. Comins, John Brodersen, Volkert Siersma, Jonas Jensen, Christian Fugl Hansen & Michael R. Krogsgaard. (2020) How to develop a condition‐specific PROM. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 31:6, pages 1216-1224.
Crossref
Tine Nielsen, Maiken Pontoppidan & Signe Boe Rayce. (2020) The Parental Stress Scale revisited: Rasch-based construct validity for Danish parents of children 2–18 years old with and without behavioral problems. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 18:1.
Crossref
Tina Hansen & Annette Kjaersgaard. (2020) Item analysis of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) by the Rasch model: a secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data obtained among community-dwelling elders. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 18:1.
Crossref
Erik Vindbjerg, Jessica Carlsson, Erik Lykke Mortensen, Guido Makransky & Tine Nielsen. (2020) A Rasch-based validity study of the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire. Journal of Affective Disorders 277, pages 697-705.
Crossref
Donald Maciver, Vaibhav Tyagi, Jessica M. Kramer, Janet Richmond, Liliya Todorova, Dulce Romero-Ayuso, Hiromi Nakamura-Thomas, Margo van Hartingsveldt, Lorna Johnston, Anne O’Hare & Kirsty Forsyth. (2020) Development, psychometrics and feasibility of the School Participation Questionnaire: A teacher measure of participation related constructs. Research in Developmental Disabilities 106, pages 103766.
Crossref
Pedro Henrique Ribeiro Santiago, Tine Nielsen, Rachel Roberts, Lisa Gaye Smithers & Lisa Jamieson. (2020) Sense of personal control: Can it be assessed culturally unbiased across Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians?. PLOS ONE 15:10, pages e0239384.
Crossref
Luz Dary Upegui-Arango, Thomas Forkmann, Tine Nielsen, Nina Hallensleben, Heide Glaesmer, Lena Spangenberg, Tobias Teismann, Georg Juckel & Maren Boecker. (2020) Psychometric evaluation of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ) using item analysis according to the Rasch model. PLOS ONE 15:8, pages e0232030.
Crossref
Rahul Nair, Anuradha Dutt & Tine Nielsen. (2019) Brief Report: Psychometric Properties of the Ability in Behavior Assessment and Interventions for Teachers-Revised (ABAIT-R). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 50:3, pages 1081-1087.
Crossref
Pedro Henrique Ribeiro Santiago, YoungHa Song, Kamal Hanna & Rahul Nair. (2019) Degrees of xerostomia? A Rasch analysis of the Xerostomia Inventory. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 48:1, pages 63-71.
Crossref
Tine Nielsen & Pedro Henrique Ribeiro Santiago. 2020. Rasch Measurement. Rasch Measurement 261 281 .
Jonathan David Comins, Kirsten Schierup Freund, Karl Bang Christensen, Jørgen Lous & John Brodersen. (2019) Validation of a health screening questionnaire for primary care using Rasch models. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 3:1.
Crossref
Tine Nielsen & Jesper Dammeyer. (2019) Measuring higher education students’ perceived stress: An IRT-based construct validity study of the PSS-10. Studies in Educational Evaluation 63, pages 17-25.
Crossref
Nina Madsen Sjoe, Dorthe Bleses, Line Dybdal, Hanne Nielsen, Karen Krag Sehested, Henriette Kirkeby, Svend Kreiner & Peter Jensen. (2017) Measurement Properties of the SEAM Questionnaire Using Rasch Analysis on Data From a Representative Danish Sample of 0- to 6-Year-Olds. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 37:3, pages 320-337.
Crossref
Janni Ammitzbøll, Anne Mette Skovgaard, Bjørn E. Holstein, Anette Andersen, Svend Kreiner & Tine Nielsen. (2019) Construct validity of a service-setting based measure to identify mental health problems in infancy. PLOS ONE 14:3, pages e0214112.
Crossref
Signe Boe Rayce, Svend Kreiner, Mogens Trab Damsgaard, Tine Nielsen & Bjørn Evald Holstein. (2018) Measurement of alienation among adolescents: construct validity of three scales on powerlessness, meaninglessness and social isolation. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 2:1.
Crossref
Maiken Pontoppidan, Tine Nielsen & Ingeborg Hedegaard Kristensen. (2018) Psychometric properties of the Danish Parental Stress Scale: Rasch analysis in a sample of mothers with infants. PLOS ONE 13:11, pages e0205662.
Crossref
Jonathan David Comins, Volkert Dirk Siersma, Martin Lind, Bent Wulff Jakobsen & Michael Rindom Krogsgaard. (2018) KNEES-ACL has superior responsiveness compared to the most commonly used patient-reported outcome measures for anterior cruciate ligament injury. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 26:8, pages 2438-2446.
Crossref
I. Alarcon, G.R. Vinding, K.B. Christensen, S. Esmann, J. Malvehy, S. Puig & G.B.E. Jemec. (2017) Spanish version of the Actinic Keratosis Quality of Life questionnaire. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 31:6, pages 986-991.
Crossref
Tine Nielsen, Guido Makransky, Maria Louison Vang & Jesper Dammeyer. (2017) How specific is specific self-efficacy? A construct validity study using Rasch measurement models. Studies in Educational Evaluation 53, pages 87-97.
Crossref
Ingeborg S. Simpelaere, Gwen Van Nuffelen, Marc De Bodt, Jan Vanderwegen & Tina Hansen. (2017) Validation of the Dutch version of the Swallowing Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (DSWAL-QoL) and the adjusted DSWAL-QoL (aDSWAL-QoL) using item analysis with the Rasch model: a pilot study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 15:1.
Crossref
R. Fieo, J. J. Manly, N. Schupf & Y. Stern. (2013) Functional Status in the Young-Old: Establishing a Working Prototype of an Extended-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 69:6, pages 766-772.
Crossref
David Andrich, Stephen M. Humphry & Ida Marais. (2012) Quantifying Local, Response Dependence Between Two Polytomous Items Using the Rasch Model. Applied Psychological Measurement 36:4, pages 309-324.
Crossref
Svend Kreiner & Karl Bang Christensen. (2011) Item Screening in Graphical Loglinear Rasch Models. Psychometrika 76:2, pages 228-256.
Crossref
David AndrichSvend Kreiner. (2010) Quantifying Response Dependence Between Two Dichotomous Items Using the Rasch Model. Applied Psychological Measurement 34:3, pages 181-192.
Crossref
Jakob Bue Bjorner & Jan Hyld Pejtersen. (2009) Evaluating construct validity of the second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire through analysis of differential item functioning and differential item effect. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 38:3_suppl, pages 90-105.
Crossref
C. W. Schnohr, S. Kreiner, E. P. Due, C. Currie, W. Boyce & F. Diderichsen. (2007) Differential Item Functioning of a Family Affluence Scale: Validation Study on Data from HBSC 2001/02. Social Indicators Research 89:1, pages 79-95.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.