9
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Attorney Argumentation and Supreme Court Opinions

Pages 22-38 | Published online: 18 Dec 2017

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (4)

Sean Patrick O'Rourke & Ron Manuto. (1994) Perceptions of rhetoric from the federal judiciary. Communication Reports 7:2, pages 76-87.
Read now
WilliamL. Benoit & J. Michael D'Agostine. (1994) “The case of the midnight judges” and multiple audience discourse: Chief Justice Marshall and Marbury V. Madison . Southern Communication Journal 59:2, pages 89-96.
Read now
WilliamL. Benoit. (1991) Argumentation in Miranda v. Arizona. Communication Studies 42:2, pages 129-140.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (13)

Tonja Jacobi, Patrick Leslie & Zoe Robinson. (2024) Institutional Design and the Predictability of Judicial Interruptions at Oral Argument. Journal of Law and Courts, pages 1-22.
Crossref
Vanise Gomes de Medeiros. (2016) Vocabulário das ruas na caderneta de um escritor. HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades 5:1, pages 67-74.
Crossref
Ryan C. Black, Rachel A. Schutte & Timothy R. Johnson. (2013) Trying to Get What You Want. Political Research Quarterly 66:4, pages 819-830.
Crossref
Karen Tracy. (2011) What’s in a name? Stance markers in oral argument about marriage laws. Discourse & Communication 5:1, pages 65-88.
Crossref
Karen Tracy. 2011. Constructing Identities at Work. Constructing Identities at Work 175 199 .
Karen Tracy. (2009) How questioning constructs judge identities: oral argument about same-sex marriage. Discourse Studies 11:2, pages 199-221.
Crossref
Isaac UnahIsaac Unah. 2009. The Supreme Court in American Politics. The Supreme Court in American Politics 107 127 .
Paul M. CollinsJr.Jr.. (2016) Lobbyists before the U.S. Supreme Court. Political Research Quarterly 60:1, pages 55-70.
Crossref
TIMOTHY R. JOHNSON, PAUL J. WAHLBECK & JAMES F. SPRIGGS. (2006) The Influence of Oral Arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court. American Political Science Review 100:1, pages 99-113.
Crossref
James F. Stratman. (2004) How legal analysts negotiate indeterminacy of meaning in common law rules: toward a synthesis of linguistic and cognitive approaches to investigation. Language & Communication 24:1, pages 23-57.
Crossref
TIMOTHY R. JOHNSON. (2016) Information, Oral Arguments, and Supreme Court Decision Making. American Politics Research 29:4, pages 331-351.
Crossref
James F. Stratman. (2016) The Emergence of Legal Composition as a Field of Inquiry: Evaluating the Prospects. Review of Educational Research 60:2, pages 153-235.
Crossref
Tonja Jacobi & Kyle Rozema. (2017) Judicial Conflicts and Voting Agreement: Evidence from Interruptions at Oral Argument. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.