Citations (19)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (10)
S. Scott Graham & Lynda Walsh. (2019) There’s No Such Thing as a Scientific Controversy. Technical Communication Quarterly 28:3, pages 192-206.
Read now
Read now
Ron Von Burg. (2012) Decades Away or The Day After Tomorrow?: Rhetoric, Film, and the Global Warming Debate. Critical Studies in Media Communication 29:1, pages 7-26.
Read now
Read now
Rachel Avon Whidden. (2012) Maternal Expertise, Vaccination Recommendations, and the Complexity of Argument Spheres. Argumentation and Advocacy 48:4, pages 243-257.
Read now
Read now
Casey Ryan Kelly & Kristen E. Hoerl. (2012) Genesis in Hyperreality: Legitimizing Disingenuous Controversy at the Creation Museum. Argumentation and Advocacy 48:3, pages 123-141.
Read now
Read now
JohnP. Jackson$suffix/text()$suffix/text(). (2010) Whatever Happened to the Cephalic Index? The Reality of Race and the Burden of Proof. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 40:5, pages 438-458.
Read now
Read now
Nathan Crick & Joseph Gabriel. (2010) The Conduit Between Lifeworld and System: Habermas and the Rhetoric of Public Scientific Controversies. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 40:3, pages 201-223.
Read now
Read now
Robert Danisch. (2010) Political Rhetoric in a World Risk Society. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 40:2, pages 172-192.
Read now
Read now
John P. Jackson$suffix/text()$suffix/text(). (2006) Argumentum Ad Hominem in the Science of Race. Argumentation and Advocacy 43:1, pages 14-28.
Read now
Read now
Lisa Keränen. (2005) Mapping Misconduct: Demarcating Legitimate Science from “Fraud” in the B-06 Lumpectomy Controversy. Argumentation and Advocacy 42:2, pages 94-113.
Read now
Read now
Robin E. Jensen. (2005) The Eating Disordered Lifestyle: Imagetexts and the Performance of Similitude. Argumentation and Advocacy 42:1, pages 1-18.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (9)
Hannah K. Patenaude & Emma Frances Bloomfield. (2022) Topical Analysis of Nuclear Experts' Perceptions of Publics, Nuclear Energy, and Sustainable Futures. Frontiers in Communication 7.
Crossref
Crossref
Sara A. Mehltretter Drury, Stephen Elstub, Oliver Escobar & Jennifer Roberts. (2021) Deliberative Quality and Expertise: Uses of Evidence in Citizens’ Juries on Wind Farms. Journal of Deliberative Democracy 17:2.
Crossref
Crossref
Gillian Roehrig, Khomson Keratithamkul & Benny Mart R. Hiwatig. 2021. Socioscientific Issues-Based Instruction for Scientific Literacy Development. Socioscientific Issues-Based Instruction for Scientific Literacy Development
256
278
.
Alison E. Vogelaar. (2021) The rhetoric of invasive species: Managing belonging on a novel planetLa rhétorique des espèces invasives : gérer l'appartenance à une nouvelle planète. Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication:21.
Crossref
Crossref
Blake Hallinan, Jed R Brubaker & Casey Fiesler. (2019) Unexpected expectations: Public reaction to the Facebook emotional contagion study. New Media & Society 22:6, pages 1076-1094.
Crossref
Crossref
Engin Karahan & Gillian Roehrig. (2016) Secondary School Students’ Understanding of Science and Their Socioscientific Reasoning. Research in Science Education 47:4, pages 755-782.
Crossref
Crossref
Patrick Belanger. 2014. Voice and Environmental Communication. Voice and Environmental Communication
44
65
.
Chantal Benoit-Barné & James McDonald. (2011) L’évolution des pratiques rhétoriques de délibération publique par la controverse. Communication:Vol. 28/2.
Crossref
Crossref
Craig O. Stewart. (2009) Socioscientific Controversies: A Theoretical and Methodological Framework. Communication Theory 19:2, pages 124-145.
Crossref
Crossref